X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:reply-to:subject:to:references:from:message-id :date:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=default; b=JovnGXJatepq/HQg xoHqH8Wwx/tBzojhZYNTv3RdpwCiqWozdK27n18POhrpIWfRw7UJzfi7Pek08llg 2mgXT7L+EUvKvYcXfKj42SRSnKiFeU/xB/m3LJHtM/uw2V4ohBXlEYcOg2CImrPZ x0pxX/Dt15icS+apKBDTHlgb1k8= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:reply-to:subject:to:references:from:message-id :date:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; s=default; bh=dolvbl6wZ404ia1DVm0/g2 ufxgI=; b=uk6qyuFeIKaYf1aE4yhZbrh6YOdUfEK0Dv/HvsQ1PWlQ80oTUZnKqZ i6iXsTxgcM5VpAECCA298FK4qp8b7NzpI4eUYehrUSA+h3rUQRPNGgvS04z1MFDx U2MKQVYlW+fNaWMZiRqhH9853ZX3cVgd9WDzMCuVp4RjGBuYDwnag= Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 spammy=cherry X-HELO: smtp-out-no.shaw.ca Reply-To: Brian DOT Inglis AT SystematicSw DOT ab DOT ca Subject: Re: Update mingw-w64 headers To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: From: Brian Inglis Openpgp: preference=signencrypt Message-ID: Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2019 23:00:19 -0600 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.9.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes On 2019-10-28 22:48, Biswapriyo Nath wrote: > I did not mean the release page [1]. I mean the cygwin headers is older > than the current mingw-w64 git repository [2]. The latest tag is v6.0.0. > [3] > > Wait, did you mean there should be a new "stable" tag or release in > mingw-w64 so that cygwin can import it? > > [1]: http://mingw-w64.org/doku.php/download > [2]: https://sourceforge.net/p/mingw-w64/mingw-w64/ci/master/tree/ > [3]: https://sourceforge.net/p/mingw-w64/mingw-w64/ref/master/tags/ Did you read what I posted or check the content at the links? Mingw64 release is 6.0.0 and so are Cygwin packages mingw64-*86-headers! Mingw64 6 was released at the end of last year and Cygwin packages were updated to 6 at the start of this year. Where is the discrepancy between Mingw64 and Cygwin headers? The Mingw64 master/HEAD/tip may not be identical to current Cygwin, as Cygwin tracks stable package release sources, but will sometimes cherry pick CVE fixes to patch between releases. -- Take care. Thanks, Brian Inglis, Calgary, Alberta, Canada This email may be disturbing to some readers as it contains too much technical detail. Reader discretion is advised. -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple