X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date
	:message-id:subject:to:content-type; q=dns; s=default; b=CU0Nhgc
	gMqY8ff2me/jfo7JpzlHhw+uSrs/n51NZxqxWcgn8dncEnDgTAkVVp4z+ECJG2cD
	2/XP7v9PWsGKG7LTrXl/FTaUxkvuca8f/em8xWzFOuS2NAN4gIqIvQ+xD9BpLERb
	gm9LYVFuGIQzHn1WkLjy1BX/jiXS6XNMM6q8=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date
	:message-id:subject:to:content-type; s=default; bh=WMq7M9Y09ROIL
	svZaaj7seon25A=; b=h5ZbfiKW5++Bmpic5qxhxorz90+6n1qFHsdBTtkRPSZK0
	eWKFupYeCy85fGBH5J3pk4aXQxU1jSGYLq1WxSTjF4UP8BN5q0Qx2upZ3Us1TAty
	F+UtXqXJoRf1ZWiu5qntOOlNg9VjjdFQJeY6qX7ypBFWeOqSZ3qNvmpifWq5BY=
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 spammy=Scott, scott
X-HELO: mail-qk1-f180.google.com
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;        d=gmail.com; s=20161025;        h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to;        bh=9H5qrNzs7GpxD63IbLgXW2q93z0XezX+Cb0XXDsn6W0=;        b=YNcuB3K34IRJyzVh3dNW3e1DBFUKKCI0JHNlZgrjEEC4axrGc5/dYGluB1TePFbODf         OGKXnAGZb9Cu8zl86Gr5TJTIBkjhi+aQxmX7QIaF8fWYKnPlhw9ooL5sCKfUJff9ilLI         96xCANfpi7Vs8vrkoRyrWVu2AwQFsmS69Cc4qChTizxmBoqXXfINi7YzF3hc6hR5mM7T         lU7Hsjpjpj2/m9Os+4ygAe6z7P/gTKuVZzZo6wgjXymGetsa5ck/p8Hp5xAgsFx3hvuT         N6ihR7VlJAEZUi7Sbw9TSyKiph8W7f+oBZnXA70bU2HrboYv8wqttqVbV4Ri15ppFdRh         sH5g==
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CALK-3mJyg6pox9a+ZNgGmspcxBFcgGJ3XymXAOOPP6_Z_tSUjQ AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <2300fe24-fc50-3d1c-6b1b-bf6da6022d2e AT SystematicSw DOT ab DOT ca> <b8379f49-3e22-23c8-80d9-d18f45e10a42 AT dronecode DOT org DOT uk> <71be3508-b11e-4681-eac6-9d44845088c7 AT SystematicSw DOT ab DOT ca> <1ac90af2-412d-345f-da40-8260ae527096 AT dronecode DOT org DOT uk>
In-Reply-To: <1ac90af2-412d-345f-da40-8260ae527096@dronecode.org.uk>
From: Csaba Raduly <rcsaba AT gmail DOT com>
Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2019 22:57:38 +0200
Message-ID: <CAEhDDbB6WRfph6+TRUgCpPiorTodozfe26GmmqOWjM2vieZn+w@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: assert creates unusable core dump on current stable Cygwin release
To: cygwin list <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"

On Thu, Oct 10, 2019 at 9:19 PM Jon Turney  wrote:

> (and I guess this patch is not acceptable as-is, as it looks like it
> would break x86)

That was my reaction too.

Csaba
-- 
You can get very substantial performance improvements
by not doing the right thing. - Scott Meyers, An Effective C++11/14 Sampler
So if you're looking for a completely portable, 100% standards-conformant way
to get the wrong information: this is what you want. - Scott Meyers (C++TDaWYK)

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple