X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=default; b=lsgEQgGS6m5Ya7rp DgP2xNUg6nELTX/X0a74qUV/KCo6gZzDZ/wnuo5pAErm2aMTbvU1D1MLOYKl5GM7 wsbRbhDOkl0kQMmdoaBPIMcy6NsOY4Kn1igtWuq2anSfZ01g+CA1HN2k329xUQ9g cZyfJBogfzyZci0muBLpRXe8Fyc= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; s=default; bh=EQb0nTVomE1OFW2zwGIIW8 igjPU=; b=MeM/5lpXcyt4NwCOlySzjnuBchPA+8dTRS4irzuAi1aocFoGABjps5 BTmg7SO8u53rBZRZxzy2qQEJzpdjcry6bqdcD9IGGw19b+oxtnbq0RGh/tbMnVez BxKTGJJ2MbA4zCBGvsK6coJHMLU8stgz8HHH6MNoCibSIRIRZmgcM= Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Spam-SWARE-Status: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?No, score=-5.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 spammy=HX-Envelope-From:sk:michael, H*r:4.77, main=e2, HContent-Transfer-Encoding:8bit?= X-HELO: atfriesa01.ssi-schaefer.com Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] cygwin 3.1.0-0.4 (TEST) To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: From: Michael Haubenwallner Openpgp: preference=signencrypt Message-ID: <855a9543-6908-42f0-576a-0f161777f715@ssi-schaefer.com> Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2019 16:54:32 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.9.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit On 9/5/19 3:16 PM, Ken Brown wrote: > The following packages have been uploaded to the Cygwin distribution > as test releases: > > * cygwin-3.1.0-0.4 > * cygwin-devel-3.1.0-0.4 > * cygwin-doc-3.1.0-0.4 > - New APIs: sched_getaffinity, sched_setaffinity, pthread_getaffinity_np, > pthread_setaffinity_np, plus CPU_SET macros. There's some problem with , seen with boost-1.71.0/bootstrap.sh, even after tweaking their sysinfo.cpp like this to include : -#if defined(OS_LINUX) +#if defined(OS_LINUX) || defined(OS_CYGWIN) This boils down to a test case like this that succeeds to *compile* on Linux, although requires _GNU_SOURCE to be defined earlier to perform anything useful: $ cat > test.cc <<'EOF' #ifdef LIKE_BOOST # include # define _GNU_SOURCE #endif #include int main() { #if defined(CPU_COUNT_S) ::cpu_set_t cpu_set; if (::sched_getaffinity(0, sizeof(cpu_set_t), &cpu_set) == 0) { return CPU_COUNT_S(sizeof(cpu_set_t), &cpu_set); } #endif return 0; } EOF Both these commands fail to compile on Cygwin with identical error: $ g++ test.c -DLIKE_BOOST $ g++ test.c test.c: In function ‘main’: test.c:10:7: warning: implicit declaration of function ‘sched_getaffinity’; did you mean ‘sched_getparam’? [-Wimplicit-function-declaration] if (sched_getaffinity(0, sizeof(cpu_set_t), &cpu_set) == 0) ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ sched_getparam Actually it is boost's fault to include before defining _GNU_SOURCE, but it feels like Cygwin should *not* define CPU_COUNT_S without _GNU_SOURCE. Thoughts? /haubi/ PS: This does work as expected: $ g++ test.c -D_GNU_SOURCE -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple