X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:from:subject:reply-to:to:references:message-id :date:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=default; b=f+0CTAdx2gfJgrL2 wUrgZVHfIuMtdxmR4SUWDVpH8y1wYQ71gfbfE69LbQn1ikto8bRfg3YSKgIfkNxQ bM8N/6cdVFafjTAwv/33X3GkYU40Qonw9x8X37XFj9IGOs03C4EMZzlff+TkpNYm A+XGBgITpqlLXiZYewplNvPLt6I= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:from:subject:reply-to:to:references:message-id :date:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; s=default; bh=fNWWZ408/LvU0ta+jUVhA8 Thj8s=; b=UgKmZ9MD7HwycntAfrM9xYk+u2P820SoPTYQp1bKct9k1IfheKOoq3 DvD4wG4qAVMJR6SBnVYUybX9i3VkDfYotYTUyChcrG95xn6OW0OAT/vQVDFZiL5t ILYck1/OGrVWak5J+jUknJvsDz0gf58iB6/v+8m/KRM47EW18f7C8= Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 spammy=sus, k, inaccessible, RETURN X-HELO: smtp-out-so.shaw.ca From: Brian Inglis Subject: Re: malloc(0) crashing with SIGABRT Reply-To: Brian DOT Inglis AT SystematicSw DOT ab DOT ca To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <366918d8-b505-45be-dc28-303579f17341 AT gmail DOT com> <78e19eb7-956e-cd05-a076-e56ce347bbbe AT gmail DOT com> Openpgp: preference=signencrypt Message-ID: <749ecff2-e384-bbfe-c961-481157c73052@SystematicSw.ab.ca> Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2019 21:59:08 -0600 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.9.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <78e19eb7-956e-cd05-a076-e56ce347bbbe@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-IsSubscribed: yes On 2019-09-09 11:13, Petr Skočík wrote: > There's been a twitter discussion on how different POSIX platforms > handle malloc(0): https://twitter.com/sortiecat/status/1170697927804817412 . > > As for Cygwin, the answer appears to be "not well", but this should be > easy to fix. POSIX SUS V4 2018 says: "RETURN VALUE Upon successful completion with size not equal to 0, malloc() shall return a pointer to the allocated space. If size is 0, either: A null pointer shall be returned [CX] [Option Start] and errno may be set to an implementation-defined value, [Option End] or A pointer to the allocated space shall be returned. The application shall ensure that the pointer is not used to access an object. Otherwise, it shall return a null pointer [CX] [Option Start] and set errno to indicate the error. [Option End]" The second option could be implemented by a pointer to an unmapped page, or a reference to an inaccessible mmap-ed area length zero. -- Take care. Thanks, Brian Inglis, Calgary, Alberta, Canada This email may be disturbing to some readers as it contains too much technical detail. Reader discretion is advised. -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple