X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:date:message-id:from:reply-to:to:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type; q=dns; s=default; b=al27cX Z21JfACk/PKc8ViAZtPauV73pvfTbATzLsU071G/JUuFtb9VfsyAV2xACK3RU3In cBZmemG29dIbc4ZGtRi6H82qSNVOZDvdHD9ulBeGFPYvDhxR2jCXoA2bpDTY0DJS pHJOXK9nIo9fUk4WkJ/qROyoc7W6iQCJ/a3Fc= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:date:message-id:from:reply-to:to:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type; s=default; bh=JV2mIk+ICcIx x2h0Mgl1qK06+jw=; b=wueSKhiX08p1NIAsrgBK1vBT8UdpElOHeL2zNnNX7FcD KzA3PmqEKMymn386Ntk5io7Sp+FXuChd8d28N6JW2tXZrktaaIJYQKPR4uQjsjh+ Cjpyy8rfnA7zq3SY4FbZ0aiuST+q1Gku4n4Z1xroafMvygvyfM6oAsCyuY3IQg0= Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,NORMAL_HTTP_TO_IP,NUMERIC_HTTP_ADDR,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 spammy=pour, ego, hurry, herself X-HELO: lb3-smtp-cloud8.xs4all.net Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2019 18:28:41 +0200 Message-ID: From: Houder Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Odd, is it not? mkdir 'e:\' cannot be undone by rmdir 'e:\' ... References: <20190827152549 DOT GY11632 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> In-Reply-to: <20190827152549.GY11632@calimero.vinschen.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=fixed User-Agent: mua.awk 0.99 On Tue, 27 Aug 2019 17:25:49, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > > On Aug 27 14:51, Houder wrote: [snip] > > Now, let's play: > > > > 64-@@ cygpath -w /drv/e > > E:\ > > > 64-@@ mkdir 'e:\' # creates subdirectory e: !!!!! > > 64-@@ rmdir 'e:\' # fails, because it refers to /drv/e > > rmdir: failed to remove 'e:\': Directory not empty > > > 64-@@ rmdir 'e:' > > > Yes, I should NOT use "DOS paths" ... > > > https://cygwin.com/cygwin-ug-net/using.html#pathnames-win32 > > > However, I wonder why e:\ is interpreted by mkdir as e:, and as > > /drv/e (that is as e:\) by rmdir. > > > Any reason for this remarkable difference? > > mkdir(2) has some special code from 2009 which drops trailing > {back}slashes to perform a bordercase in mkdir Linux-compatible. > This code snippet doesn't exist in rmdir(2). .. uhm, I must be speaking to the alter ego of Corinna V,. because as far as I know, Corinna has given herself some time off ... Perhaps you could make an entry in her "TODO list" that the 3 lines above requires some more explanation for pour souls like me. No, there is no hurry ... Henri -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple