X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:date:message-id:from:reply-to:to:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type; q=dns; s=default; b=kGb+A0 R2wypyCEM78IFbaZYzohODWxZoIeSu+lOVprsW1rOaPgJzbYh8fVY+gso9N1t0bu gQzs1NtbHvWzUuZ5/qbl6+HG7/v5iw1djVo7I4PuprzaM0/3+J+wLaudUXg96jrE e+wqFgWWikH+ZMvZegM7UPEe7wHkgaxkIXBFU= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:date:message-id:from:reply-to:to:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type; s=default; bh=xpguZRQNt2Sa VfBgSJhc5yL01F0=; b=Bj29UKf6WAU00ifjiEZAVOOgGR/SVNn4d/QgTqKtStMp gFLj2f7iSs2AtshtDindc8EGyKkORoBzmAT3n203HKZpl1wux6mWLHSRDH/tniPo KMG+0IT8KLBdD5JI0ovZHhRfqfpelOPzFoxHVSlVcjKwifEKFqoBgGJDQH4yL3c= Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,NORMAL_HTTP_TO_IP,NUMERIC_HTTP_ADDR,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 spammy=study, H*F:D*nl X-HELO: lb2-smtp-cloud9.xs4all.net Date: Tue, 06 Aug 2019 08:22:25 +0200 Message-ID: <1a3b494cbcf1bdc792b9993836f9d44c@smtp-cloud9.xs4all.net> From: Houder Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Empty file without "x" permission is successfully executable on Cygwin References: In-Reply-to: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=fixed User-Agent: mua.awk 0.99 On Mon, 5 Aug 2019 18:18:52, Lavrentiev, Anton (NIH/NLM/NCBI) [C] via cygwin" wrote: > Hi, > > Please consider the following shell session: > > $ cat dummy.c > #include > > int main() > { > return 0; > } > $ gcc -o dummy dummy.c > $ mv dummy.exe dummy > $ ./dummy > $ echo $? > 0 > $ chmod a-x dummy > $ ./dummy > -bash: ./dummy: Permission denied > $ rm dummy > $ touch dummy > $ ./dummy > $ echo $? > 0 > > So Cygwin lets the shell to execute a zero-sized file regardless of > the "x" perm ... zero-sized? Irrelevant. [snip] > Is that expected? On Unix, an empty file can only be executed (exit > code 0) if there's the "x" permission granted. Yes, Cygwin != Linux. 64-@@ echo date > dummy 64-@@ ls -l dummy -rw-r--r-- 1 Henri None 5 Aug 6 08:01 dummy 64-@@ ./dummy Tue Aug 6 08:01:19 CEST 2019 64-@@ dash $ ./dummy Tue Aug 6 08:01:38 CEST 2019 <==== (execution by /bin/sh) $ mv /bin/sh /bin/OOS $ ls -l /bin/sh.exe ls: cannot access '/bin/sh.exe': No such file or directory $ ./dummy dash: 4: ./dummy: not found <==== attempted to execute "script" using /bin/sh Also study: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/7268437/bash-script-execution-with-and-without-shebang-in-linux-and-bsd ( Bash script execution with and without shebang in Linux and BSD ) and http://www.faqs.org/faqs/unix-faq/faq/part3/section-16.html Henri -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple