X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:from:subject:reply-to:to:references:message-id :date:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=default; b=tndCZj17e+qu48GY qIqjxdQVgMfxpGvd28vUzJiNfuDn44UjiHolbTv+NexfIvy9NvOErcFxrrmjgMKi QCuuY5FtIiUeTgQwJYL+J3v602p4sd73fXl8s8jshRUBC+u13/yYC4CY995qo9gm Z9YRV398/ylhrpmy9d0GDo3IUnM= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:from:subject:reply-to:to:references:message-id :date:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; s=default; bh=9P2QsMT09dU5Mzv5rVudRY +v7GQ=; b=ddl/pTi16VCGxjzA6834yJWHaxxCfMILZrTcBltpdJIg53EvDOsShS gLq/29Gp+c1FusICl2fbaw+d5NXd6RDWqGFFocOa6T1jFjNvvfPuf9mLHmr9jlrd DNaUjyM9ALCAQADniq7HanjdvKCLilXkYDa4iQQOQSr91aWAt3XH0= Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-3.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 spammy=Till, Inglis, Riedel, inglis X-HELO: smtp-out-so.shaw.ca From: Brian Inglis Subject: Re: Are there any changes to the access control to /proc//fd/1 in cygwin 3? Reply-To: Brian DOT Inglis AT SystematicSw DOT ab DOT ca To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: Openpgp: preference=signencrypt Message-ID: Date: Sun, 16 Jun 2019 09:42:25 -0600 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.7.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-IsSubscribed: yes On 2019-06-15 12:27, Till Riedel wrote: > I have been using a very handy sudo hack, that broke lately (I think) when > updating cygwin: https://github.com/imachug/win-sudo > The trick is to spawn an elevated process using powershell and hook up the > calling file descripters. I now get "write error: Bad file descriptor" > To reproduce call: > powershell.exe Start-Process bash  \"-c\",\"\'echo \>\>/proc/$$/fd/1 hello > world\;sleep 10\'\" > IMHO this used to work in former versions (print out hello world on the calling > shell). Strangely > bash -c "echo >/proc/$$/fd/1 hello world" > works. So my initial guess is that is has to do with the decoupling of Cygwin > PIDs from Windows PIDs, but there were also changes in the proc file system... > Thanks a lot in advance for any help/thoughts! Given: $ bash -c 'ls -dglo /dev/std* /proc/self /proc/$$ /proc/self/fd/[012]' lrwxrwxrwx 1 15 May 14 2013 /dev/stderr -> /proc/self/fd/2 lrwxrwxrwx 1 15 May 14 2013 /dev/stdin -> /proc/self/fd/0 lrwxrwxrwx 1 15 May 14 2013 /dev/stdout -> /proc/self/fd/1 dr-xr-xr-x 3 0 Jun 16 01:37 /proc/23846 lrwxrwxrwx 1 0 Jun 16 01:37 /proc/self -> 23846 lrwxrwxrwx 1 0 Jun 16 01:37 /proc/self/fd/0 -> /dev/pty0 lrwxrwxrwx 1 0 Jun 16 01:37 /proc/self/fd/1 -> /dev/pty0 lrwxrwxrwx 1 0 Jun 16 01:37 /proc/self/fd/2 -> /dev/pty0 the following seems to work as expected: $ powershell Start-Process bash \"-c\",\"\'echo \>\>/dev/stdout hello world\;sleep 10\'\" -- Take care. Thanks, Brian Inglis, Calgary, Alberta, Canada This email may be disturbing to some readers as it contains too much technical detail. Reader discretion is advised. -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple