DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to
	:content-type; q=dns; s=default; b=AemrD1E6mdayeP1RZXX/n9f+PiqHB
	070F6jgCyOQhCVfsCEJLz94prwDoA9NofTnYRDOBRKxIqsEXKoZwUgSsLNVCfCyS
	+vLm/LFMZW8r3lutkgqZTAyzhdbO/twSum9TuQ8ZgWRF8CeklgH1Auw2KMzUfiuL
	i84VaKEwHcqUGw=
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Ivan Shynkarenka <chronoxor AT gmail DOT com>
Date: Thu, 30 May 2019 13:30:52 +0300
Message-ID: <CAHVoUt0KCKGS8frgnYdhaiBaJ52KrfYGX8UageUxk52T_Q44kw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Test: cmake-3.13.1-1
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"

>
> I have no problem, but Tony thinks that as the cmake test suite test
> is not perfect so he prefers to stay with the old one.
>
> 99% tests passed, 4 tests failed out of 548
>
>
> I was not able to identify the failures root cause,
> and I suspect they are not fundamental and related to the test
> suite itfelf.
>
> Regards
> Marco
>
>
Old cmake 3.6.2-1 is very-very old and not actual in C++ world. I use new
cmake 3.13.1-1 test version for half a year and see no issues. I think 4
failed tests of 548 that are not affect of main functionality is not a good
reason to delay cmake release for so long time...

I vote to move a new cmake from test to release!

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple