X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:from:to:subject:references:date:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=default; b=U3C/gN6NZcssXEqab/2iHP1tI4bIgo5pGWl7hYtQ7F9 RWwgJMBiGFb54HDIAINOVD/+qqF4DGvzOQD2qMCcTJJlsMHouhIHsr09FEY0kqaB 7WA5ZM8xU/ydQDpJ6mtkTMEKseX4CpzPzli6Mx0GuxoxO1kfnjwfufgYRy+Hwgng = DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:from:to:subject:references:date:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=default; bh=zNBsD5TcIdRcgXX/ZCYujRvxw1o=; b=C1w8g32JPvalkAiY8 6AqhBvT1fzbLJz5stgdub3fHpYkaVZzG7EU5ZeJyIzzLKCy4XiIzKHfYP3laKkt4 tEcwhII1qjvxFret9tMt12As1p3KezNVixspsHl42zEloq3r1qLhoYOP1F0mIiYN SeCjndLPcKsS1C1cksVixmSn8s= Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 spammy=our, HX-Spam-Relays-External:ESMTPA X-HELO: vsmx012.vodafonemail.xion.oxcs.net From: Achim Gratz To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Is our use of Cygwin to build & run OpenOCD a good one? References: Date: Mon, 20 May 2019 19:53:59 +0200 In-Reply-To: (Bob Cochran's message of "Sun, 19 May 2019 15:43:56 -0400") Message-ID: <87k1elui4o.fsf@Rainer.invalid> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id x4KHsJS1018376 Bob Cochran writes: > We recently wrote up our process on building OpenOCD using Cygwin on > Windows 10 and shared it on the OpenOCD mail list.   And, I received > the following feedback: > > "Cygwin? this is probably still functional, but now can be considered > a (pre)historic solution." More likely a fossilized memory of a very old Cygwin by that commenter. > I personally have been using Cygwin for many years and have come to > trust it for interfacing to Linux and macOS boxes from Windows.  I > think it's a great project, so when I wanted to build & run OpenOCD > from scratch, I naturally went to Cygwin. > > I would appreciate any feedback on our use of Cygwin for building & > running OpenOCD: https://mindchasers.com/dev/openocd-darsena-windows > > If fellow Cygwin users think it's a poor use case, then we'll pull the > article. It works, you don't have to jump through burning hoops to get there and it helps you out for when you have to use a Windows box. So, all around a good use-case, really. Regards, Achim. -- +<[Q+ Matrix-12 WAVE#46+305 Neuron microQkb Andromeda XTk Blofeld]>+ SD adaptation for Waldorf Blofeld V1.15B11: http://Synth.Stromeko.net/Downloads.html#WaldorfSDada -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple