X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:reply-to:subject:to:references:from:message-id
	:date:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type
	:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=default; b=eThG8dU2EWeocbPU
	y83WnRoQ7VNiN5ACwutaf2fy90ASuBsriXCXpPjR5EviLTQLFpPm/6ra0b7ip6p/
	K5C1mAegMRkWxFgGEErYGQb1OAYMKpA9xOILWEVJudVANO2Kqphh9ytmbRBo0Reu
	Aut42/DvMQwKpZ/jAbkdXhKzx+E=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:reply-to:subject:to:references:from:message-id
	:date:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type
	:content-transfer-encoding; s=default; bh=kLmnEuaY16xwCckw7s/fKt
	0oZss=; b=rN/l1FnLP+baHcnDkNf29KypVfI5SBTwcpVVhkwFzePD2Y1WigfvsF
	vkApcfUMY14t2Llm40tkpxzwN1uUGEr+tPcIIavRQJjklgjJBIQejlb+npV/rTpI
	rBPQO0Lj96V9bpWReeiC7J58+auXG1Gl/do67yPRtQSOnF/yZpg6A=
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-3.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 spammy=Take, HX-Languages-Length:1099
X-HELO: smtp-out-so.shaw.ca
Reply-To: Brian DOT Inglis AT SystematicSw DOT ab DOT ca
Subject: Re: Why is __unix__ defined, and not __WINDOWS__ ?
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References: <5fbb6229-da17-c056-19b9-9819c684a8ad AT agner DOT org> <20190512203330 DOT GA30710 AT spikycactus DOT attlocal DOT net> <75d7872a826c01b59f2576fa0bd5bf73 AT smtp-cloud8 DOT xs4all DOT net>
From: Brian Inglis <Brian DOT Inglis AT SystematicSw DOT ab DOT ca>
Openpgp: preference=signencrypt
Message-ID: <b5cce884-1654-255c-fe5c-0ec460368b53@SystematicSw.ab.ca>
Date: Sun, 12 May 2019 22:40:48 -0600
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.6.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <75d7872a826c01b59f2576fa0bd5bf73@smtp-cloud8.xs4all.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-IsSubscribed: yes

On 2019-05-12 14:54, Houder wrote:
> On Sun, 12 May 2019 13:33:30, Mike Gran via cygwin"  wrote:

>> I think these days the canonical defines are (somebody correct me if
>> I'm wrong)
>>   __CYGWIN__ for Cygwin
>>   _WIN32 as 1 on MinGW when the compilation target is Windows 32-bit
>>   ARM, 64-bit ARM, x86, or x64. Otherwise, undefined.
>>   _WIN64 as 1 on MinGW when the compilation target is Windows 64-bit
>>   ARM or x64. Otherwise, undefined

> https://sourceforge.net/p/predef/wiki/Home/

That information is 15 years out of date, a lot of the platforms are dead or
obsolete, and compilers are gone or changed a lot. There is no attempt at
discrimination across clang or gcc platforms, and no mention of Cygwin or Mingw
platforms, newlib or musl libraries, nor mention of other feature test macros:
better do "man feature_test_macros" for currently useful information.

-- 
Take care. Thanks, Brian Inglis, Calgary, Alberta, Canada

This email may be disturbing to some readers as it contains
too much technical detail. Reader discretion is advised.

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple