DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date
	:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type; q=dns; s=default; b=DPlR
	tL1e/UY27dNAaSR3VEWhatfRA1QD1resfeRr5XHa0kqW3OHUq4jtyDshI+v2cGDB
	r6aFrP8JBglfuGBagNCv6dxNjdXVXwbkJOBOqE7oWC0Uy2lo0f6UCx2uzxHk92xI
	vSw1PvZEj0VII2lpMR0bGh8CgCMF2xllNjoEJAo=
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: How to become root/root (0/0)
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References: <e5962fd2-8705-33a4-c4ce-94a78b55b70c AT t-online DOT de> <1529177562 DOT 20190509150945 AT yandex DOT ru>
From: LRN <lrn1986 AT gmail DOT com>
Message-ID: <dd96c814-7196-e139-dd4e-54fa43e814a7@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 9 May 2019 15:30:37 +0300
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.6.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <1529177562.20190509150945@yandex.ru>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="LDA1MhOHiL2uEGKtL3Iaba4lUKeRcmHFX"

--LDA1MhOHiL2uEGKtL3Iaba4lUKeRcmHFX
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="61fGyt5uq0DLQTukO9XBtVtAoIlUkinsN";
 protected-headers="v1"
From: LRN <lrn1986 AT gmail DOT com>
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Message-ID: <dd96c814-7196-e139-dd4e-54fa43e814a7 AT gmail DOT com>
Subject: Re: How to become root/root (0/0)


--61fGyt5uq0DLQTukO9XBtVtAoIlUkinsN
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On 09.05.2019 15:09, Andrey Repin wrote:
> Greetings, Henning!
>=20
>> And the group "None". I found it mentioned in ntsec. Would it be
>> possible to create a group "root" in Windows which gives it's
>> members the same power as the group Administrators? And why "None"
>> and not "Administrators"?
>=20
> Administrators do not have all possible permissions inherently.
> Again, there's simply no equivalent of "god user" from *NIX in Windows
> permissions system.

IIRC, the SYSTEM user has the most permissions, but users are normally
forbidden from doing things as SYSTEM.


--61fGyt5uq0DLQTukO9XBtVtAoIlUkinsN--

--LDA1MhOHiL2uEGKtL3Iaba4lUKeRcmHFX
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=VLwN
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--LDA1MhOHiL2uEGKtL3Iaba4lUKeRcmHFX--