X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:subject:from:to:references:message-id:date :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type; q=dns; s=default; b=Cdy+ 4phbcwkGPs5MafVkFIBf+cuGwFM/1n7ierkKUf4ohSrbMGBcJDXRN7V38RaDktKJ p9G+WnvApcsJrLonqwZ9rEGxOsSBGhsftd7NLoCuDNW/4YuwRrUGsieCR2DjK76y AZGMMDT8NwntoMLWlnV5ToMfunNu8m+S/v/BFfw= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:subject:from:to:references:message-id:date :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type; s=default; bh=2UcRWhsea1 kn/IDCMNEHARRtOx4=; b=lB5GBbysBU42D0u5NbQXjXpD8ZCWYbEIJKtxMSIHnd mp44sW0fccEYc5UBuZn9VBFpqciNxJ5Y8TE1axQdWDfZDXKSnVfjKbrp1NsfX6ZO ksO+KQqFEqsvQTayqQJjX99tNL5JNhqYpGYDjKX4fn4zxz52w02KCR0kurD4j0cB A= Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,FREEMAIL_FROM,KAM_NUMSUBJECT,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no version=3.3.1 spammy=H*RU:sk:broadba, HX-Spam-Relays-External:sk:broadba, madison, H*r:192.168.4 X-HELO: mail-lf1-f66.google.com DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:from:to:references:autocrypt:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=VUE0i3CeIzkqqGFmbg7v03EjJ9bpCw9vYbwGw1RNckc=; b=AdGmgbDCD+85J4qr2cJA+kfzlSXMv66KbsxxFKb+oOYiSnPt455ptGloGaW8FormDh PnL9nPyHXZNBjaZQcVa8DrJmXIr+VJ/scgtUUY7H3rGGyR2VvgsX+blTrzwLLzw50w+3 0skMTfMxcUu7U2vLJcIgJD0dgXnORezkkbDs4gzkna1T7ZbJf8i52YaJt35jCbwUj9RW 7TV9tA/qfRzctVpp4ujhC1sCNoBwpTSzWQKFq7yWhUzoQ3rp13gp823gLMn2vnK6KRkv vuiuF/i/4TvG2ggXxKcRyMJbrvCYX03cbIgi4itAipljLTC9f3Sl3sg6vZ0VRbAPUX6L o3Bg== Subject: [Attn. Maintainer] glib2.0 From: LRN To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <18ed9090-2c35-cca2-4b7f-2d057a44b351 AT gmail DOT com> Message-ID: <3f29b164-8cdb-355c-36dc-5d56412fe1e4@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2019 20:43:34 +0300 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.6.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <18ed9090-2c35-cca2-4b7f-2d057a44b351@gmail.com> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="PuZfjN0qYT3XKzplfNbQW1fX9kmgndRmG" X-IsSubscribed: yes --PuZfjN0qYT3XKzplfNbQW1fX9kmgndRmG Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="FqQXG84wTgIOuXvAv9INlh72lhWRi65uk"; protected-headers="v1" From: LRN To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Message-ID: <3f29b164-8cdb-355c-36dc-5d56412fe1e4 AT gmail DOT com> Subject: [Attn. Maintainer] glib2.0 --FqQXG84wTgIOuXvAv9INlh72lhWRi65uk Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 03.04.2019 15:16, LRN wrote: > On 05.03.2019 17:23, LRN wrote: >> On 05.03.2019 17:07, E. Madison Bray wrote: >>> >>> If they're clean, worthwhile patches then I absolutely think you >>> should get them integrated upstream if at all possible--that's almost >>> always preferable. >> >> Okay, i'll see what i can do. >> >=20 > Made some progress, but i would benefit from some input on a few things. >=20 > 1) This[0] cygwinports commit and a related gnulib[1] commit. Which versi= on of > cygwin (CYGWIN_VERSION_API_MINOR) corresponds to 1.7 (is the 1.7 number e= ven > correct?). As a less-intrusive fix, i can switch > #ifdef __CYGWIN__ > to > #if defined(__CYGWIN) && (!defined (CYGWIN_VERSION_API_MINOR) || > CYGWIN_VERSION_API_MINOR < somevalue) >=20 >=20 > 2) This[2] cygwinports commit. I don't quite get what the author means. D= oes he > mean that returning a path that looks like "//etc" from parsing a URI > "file:////etc" is correct? Or the opposite, that it should return "/etc" = ? The > commit seems to be saying one thing, while the code does something else. >=20 >=20 > [0]: > https://github.com/cygwinports/glib2.0/commit/b61abed9554ab813ed358ea5bad= 648987573772e#diff-2d64c930085856723abe9a40105389abR256 >=20 > [1]: > https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/gnulib.git/commit/lib/localcharset.c?id= =3D9f5ab735f030faf651961d55ce3b849dd56dcff3 >=20 > [2]: > https://github.com/cygwinports/glib2.0/commit/40ca93c8ae81e7a05ec098246b4= 3ce74e157ebd6#diff-c86c0d1edc7cdc043b8b01ee6e526817 >=20 Added the "[Attn. Maintainer] glib2.0" tag to the subject, as suggested in a different thread. --FqQXG84wTgIOuXvAv9INlh72lhWRi65uk-- --PuZfjN0qYT3XKzplfNbQW1fX9kmgndRmG Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCAAdFiEE4MWzR43wYaAzEA49ja3pJ2dZunQFAly3ZcYACgkQja3pJ2dZ unSwJRAAoybUxKL69L3voTahIPYjyC+IKYezH/JFdljbp9mDBz82lArn89ksgJT5 lu1l8oGYoBqBNktZ2SRKbC2gvr9tuceQga/GFiAdT8WuKA3rtwQC0bvZhlQOupjb hPKAdal/GSf7Zm+dYYFpngAEgFJrNGMQjWMLIR9iQeSriHRarAc2C+gr/0qtEyls Wo+voRHzmP4K/SUQGl2Sw9tm9cy1vcfQB0abhEflJZ5JnpDpNDSuBMw9O9n3Bpbn weFE9ZR02dxB9BXPBpBCsMIXsT/Fpkqjp1+7X6udXy2Lh/Y3wlemKPx0eE7P5B2S ULU3AVI747WVWfF5ByvepQ9jUk/BA78JPvt9g/2muvbKo3AjS0ybYAe+5qDksOu+ A6FcxAPX9kFc8CbbSvc5VnLewkpMg96vNUrnHkTxBgv8g/19KYijbAFVqo0Sn1kk JyzSFDLGZxEuX05pS6Qjj+/iisMQ7CVTJpuSsvmqH2MABHjAHssNDVrzhsPS3R/m xNIT5+rWVNMo0bMeJX0GryJvf6G6Cigg9zFSo9FQVcW/nA5hTyDK54T2H8v1wfzF 4Li2wrXCoMrL1KFcUfsS7qPvqgiiSKUniBYi/F2DusI0zRNgvTzK6oILOKTntXhP yOI+VtgKSEGp4WRbtTC9bn00/ZIevW0sPoFi5wOyvXT2nzX4plg= =K8Ve -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --PuZfjN0qYT3XKzplfNbQW1fX9kmgndRmG--