X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:reply-to:subject:to:references:from:message-id :date:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=default; b=jRXDp9l6PefX+0h3 qhgh/WFOpUYpos9+CBBlBg6kgR1h+nKR6DYAcU10YqxQQOMgmJqTmJcjlUnrdPhP i455cHJHHrFNGJU2HrSQGh6uK0WW/KqdTGh5FPzbBrntZcmhCmOA8lwS6gQjGMn/ WpVBcsU10O3nVZ8Ey7JD2X22oZU= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:reply-to:subject:to:references:from:message-id :date:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; s=default; bh=T1FTums3c7Mclyt4UvCW1V C5djc=; b=C0wM/9d6CRhxvpMGzKrC5Jq8IODigYsPhPd0oCQh5vexxVcmJrD9Yl zsiTgWCmKQyoVBAwLJmK8wXKDV02cEgXojiR2VzfbfqJynivINGF19I9CkJplTNv Lo1RkGArBSMbTHqeDHkR1yECrxgmHi++kj5tgqXIOfElmSOujgHXo= Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-6.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,GIT_PATCH_2,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 spammy= X-HELO: smtp-out-so.shaw.ca Reply-To: Brian DOT Inglis AT SystematicSw DOT ab DOT ca Subject: Re: sshd/SYSTEM account/OS version and Cygwin "bitness" limitations To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: From: Brian Inglis Openpgp: preference=signencrypt Message-ID: <31d69fd2-4906-4e32-29ca-d5bedb31088d@SystematicSw.ab.ca> Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2019 17:18:48 -0600 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.6.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes On 2019-03-28 15:36, Bill Stewart wrote: > I am trying to understand the limitations when running sshd using the > SYSTEM account. > Is the following complete and correct? > ========== > OS_version* OS_bitness sshd_bitness Notes > -------------------------------------------------- > < 6.3 64-bit 32-bit Note 1 > < 6.3 64-bit 64-bit Note 2 > < 6.3 32-bit 32-bit Note 2 >> = 6.3 64-bit 64-bit No problems >> = 6.3 64-bit 32-bit No problems >> = 6.3 32-bit 32-bit No problems > * "< 6.3" = "older than Windows 8.1/Server 2012 R2"; ">= 6.3" = "at least > Windows 8.1/Server 2012 R2" > Note 1: sshd cannot authenticate local accounts, but it can authenticate > domain accounts. > Note 2: sshd can't authenticate local accounts after a reboot unless > another logon happens first. > Unfortunate implication of Note 1: 32-bit version of sshd running as SYSTEM > account on OS < 6.3 on non-domain member computer cannot authenticate any > accounts. cygstart /usr/share/doc/Cygwin/html/ntsec.html -- Take care. Thanks, Brian Inglis, Calgary, Alberta, Canada This email may be disturbing to some readers as it contains too much technical detail. Reader discretion is advised. -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple