X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:reply-to:subject:to:references:from:message-id :date:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=default; b=xmBIuLeMhCJWB24a 8f1GOixj3Rxz29gDJOqG5XVn8/mOCWnbdLZDL65sQvZMos9hrGioBIJwVL+2c8TQ Irr+4QwNFolcMPEl8qHUhL4moVkj9G60Uof6iMQV6iwKR322sZUnXu8W+KSdMzFo GLnKyuPTPjqwss3QrR9fq6tXqWE= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:reply-to:subject:to:references:from:message-id :date:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; s=default; bh=CfskrK8vbZIypx2xnpxVrN TcQBg=; b=U7iL8Ic0RBWU7A9luAoBf7TclaQaCHGhs6vCjnuwuh2WgP8u3WxT+d dMrgpRLxL86KTly7tDww042GMqBGWHSgKmYhnQNG6muxR5ZlLi6ttoVG3j68lnsC lEy04dCnDP0IWaTrErRxFMHbEZKji28ZCe6kWCaB/D4H67oP6ZhZ4= Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-3.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KAM_NUMSUBJECT,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 spammy=explain X-HELO: smtp-out-no.shaw.ca Reply-To: Brian DOT Inglis AT SystematicSw DOT ab DOT ca Subject: Re: [PATCH] default ps -W process start time to system boot time when inaccessible, 0, -1 To: cygwin-patches AT cygwin DOT com, Cygwin References: <20190323034522 DOT 9688-1-Brian DOT Inglis AT SystematicSW DOT ab DOT ca> <87d0mh5x3u DOT fsf AT Rainer DOT invalid> <20190323183653 DOT GB3471 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <874l7tbfh6 DOT fsf AT Rainer DOT invalid> <4dfdfce1-245d-98fe-0c49-890ba8ec8dd4 AT SystematicSw DOT ab DOT ca> <874l7s65yv DOT fsf AT Rainer DOT invalid> From: Brian Inglis Openpgp: preference=signencrypt Message-ID: Date: Sun, 24 Mar 2019 10:17:55 -0600 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <874l7s65yv.fsf@Rainer.invalid> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes On 2019-03-24 02:18, Achim Gratz wrote: > Brian Inglis writes: >> Are there non-startup system processes for which boot time is misleading? >> If you need the truth use wmic, procexp64, or run ps in an elevated shell. > > I don't seem to get my point across. I'm fine with getting no start > time value when that ps wasn't able to obtain that information. If we > have to use magic values to convey that information for one reason or > another, then I'd rather opt for one that is obviously pulled out of > thin air than for one that I have to compare to some other stuff before > that becomes clear. [Cross posting to Cygwin list as this is a more general discussion IMO] Boot time is neither magic nor pulled out of thin air. Checking *my* system processes using wmic queries and elevated powershell scripts, the boot time is at most a few seconds off from process start times from other sources. I understand that other systems may run processes where that is not the case. Please explain why you think this is misleadingly not useful, or where or which processes have unvailable start times that are not very close to boot time. -- Take care. Thanks, Brian Inglis, Calgary, Alberta, Canada This email may be disturbing to some readers as it contains too much technical detail. Reader discretion is advised. -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple