X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:date:from:reply-to:to:message-id:in-reply-to
	:references:subject:mime-version:content-type
	:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=default; b=j8DfN0dJhWzdgdzs
	SprhAr0J07pxXlLxyzFzx0bWy8/f1y4+Gl0nbPT/P6w5QIcHCpk2lbGzpZcZJU/l
	3hiJQ2e+gOtxtoMvmXBbCqYEEQbODIgHa6qO43ByW2DjOyR6LRAAzJBewdbxwo6G
	5IveiYCx53CGBxAnWNDtZTb4aQs=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:date:from:reply-to:to:message-id:in-reply-to
	:references:subject:mime-version:content-type
	:content-transfer-encoding; s=default; bh=Y6r0+y02SCpuCGU3Z352lG
	y9e3k=; b=rlT+1UNEebg1OiTzvElpWoXFY+Rn5zX9QW/TWg16zs2XvUgqNKrQCM
	xGNFE+SU8kE5BLQlCawMWuNYU5Op2u530jeWeEzZEwsJWVDheA7E6hy06YTGgl1L
	4n6f1nUNDDAdz7ZoON1bnR0PhRg91PX69ReF9OK+Pq1lmH90wqNEI=
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-7.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,FREEMAIL_FROM,GIT_PATCH_2,KAM_NUMSUBJECT,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 spammy=ticket, participate, tickets, H*r:NNFMP
X-HELO: nh604-vm9.bullet.mail.ssk.yahoo.co.jp
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1552642815;	s=yj20110701; d=yahoo.co.jp;	h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding;	bh=stNDPpQTT6fFgx/pLESWI355slW8xCTH5p5eFd3Shyg=;	b=hQMBK+XrCl6SWo7FrA1DBiALorfCwDVtcFHoVtNAPK6TZjV65ykkt2DMeWx1sZkH	BffWQouIC5S8ygOXrV141x9bSP6eljdXDrZlVZq88adkJZ+/UeUAlVePLuLJrhRcQDv	j4JzvtIj+AMSMdYbl53WfGVSWzKGgpvprdDRi9oc=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=yj20110701; d=yahoo.co.jp;	h=Date:From:Reply-To:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding;	b=JbM03pUz3LAWQRKawlgZRX6NXht/okFnLOYS23WxqY9CUAjtTk84917PXAOHtrlK	QAObnvcS4CMgqGqKov3xwa8BHrxQp7ST0WWF+TVf3mYOdkSanp6uIfZOcJLCbGTtwJC	ZvyrQKHbhqeL4TmHd7q7mjEyLYrbnW5o2AcjTbBA=;
Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2019 18:40:14 +0900 (JST)
From: Tatsuro MATSUOKA <tmacchant2 AT yahoo DOT co DOT jp>
Reply-To: Tatsuro MATSUOKA <matsuoka AT nuce DOT nagoya-u DOT ac DOT jp>
To: Mark Geisert <mark AT maxrnd DOT com>, <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Message-ID: <1216344404.1733525.1552642814407.JavaMail.yahoo@mail.yahoo.co.jp>
In-Reply-To: <17710c05-3ccc-b8de-6b8b-db022c1f1ce3@maxrnd.com>
References: <1439412702 DOT 1866573 DOT 1551653028041 DOT JavaMail DOT yahoo DOT ref AT mail DOT yahoo DOT co DOT jp> <1439412702 DOT 1866573 DOT 1551653028041 DOT JavaMail DOT yahoo AT mail DOT yahoo DOT co DOT jp> <0faa5fb55a0af4803fcdff786dba8be440355609 DOT camel AT cygwin DOT com> <1346787976 DOT 482037 DOT 1552451229824 DOT JavaMail DOT yahoo AT mail DOT yahoo DOT co DOT jp> <Pine DOT BSF DOT 4 DOT 63 DOT 1903130118170 DOT 46302 AT m0 DOT truegem DOT net> <17710c05-3ccc-b8de-6b8b-db022c1f1ce3 AT maxrnd DOT com>
Subject: Re: Patch request to qt 5.9.4
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id x2F9eVDK012224

----- Original Message -----

> From: Mark Geisert 
> To: cygwinm
> Cc: 
> Date: 2019/3/15, Fri 17:06
> Subject: Re: Patch request to qt 5.9.4
> 
> Mark Geisert wrote:
>>  I believe I've found the root cause of this issue of outbound connect 
> on a
>>  non-blocking socket not working under Cygwin.
> [...]
> 
> Hi Tatsuro,
> This Qt issue should be reported to their developers.  Do you have experience 
> opening a ticket with them?  If so, please do so and let me know the ticket/bug 
> number.  I will participate in discussion there.  I could also open a ticket 
> myself if you prefer that I do it.
> 
> It seems to me that we should continue to apply your one-line patch that turns 
> off O_NONBLOCK at that one Qt location, as a workaround for this Qt problem on 
> Cygwin.  When the Qt devs fix the root cause and release a new Qt containing the 
> 
> fix, we can then remove our local patch.
> 
> ..mark
> 
> Yaakov: Does this all sound reasonable to you?
> 
I do not have experience opening a ticket of Qt.
However, I frequently open bug tickets to gnuplot and GNU Octave.

I will try it tomorrow and report here about submit of the ticket.

Tatsuro


--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple