X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:reply-to:subject:to:references:from:message-id :date:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=default; b=DhJ5oWhGCtLXIHGS wqXANgSv0adStQOoZZ/zt3kCsaWPKfIV4Xj+/KzSeGQ1dqDTA9Pg3JEQQ8dw2l7e 6toigdKocvVIs7zV97cetXsNhHiVFLtGXyD83AcAKJtzq5Y4XrGIp0z85RYAL2+7 IxzmNKQVWogJz+b1/+jWVEst1z8= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:reply-to:subject:to:references:from:message-id :date:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; s=default; bh=nah8OdpO3Bb7eCz3IBsAIb oZBcs=; b=O3EeVydMByhmcE6tRRwcMZUW6kF/V7/6rQyj8NqdbJMf+vIJC4Zydw /1Mih0Yk+JcmB5HtHpgHA7ymxZ85p6Q0RtZb4patPbqvNwj1bqIBBlIzA+warHFY UZ1PZVXUCKegXKPjUPmIsQEbEOAS6bbvIzxPs0zg5u9Sz8pe45hZw= Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 spammy=HX-Languages-Length:1026 X-HELO: smtp-out-so.shaw.ca Reply-To: Brian DOT Inglis AT SystematicSw DOT ab DOT ca Subject: Re: SSL not required for setup.exe download To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <5C859BB7 DOT 4040900 AT tlinx DOT org> From: Brian Inglis Openpgp: preference=signencrypt Message-ID: <35afcb0a-7494-9d13-02f3-b3d21f33e810@SystematicSw.ab.ca> Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2019 07:13:40 -0600 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.5.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes On 2019-03-10 21:53, Archie Cobbs wrote: > On Sun, Mar 10, 2019 at 6:20 PM L A Walsh wrote: >>>> It would be safer if http://www.cygwin.com always redirected you to >>>> https://www.cygwin.com, where the page and the link are SSL. >>>> Is there any reason not to force this redirect and close this security hole? >> >> I think the point is that if you redirect and a client can't >> speak https, what happens? Wouldn't they get an error that would >> prevent them from using the site? > > I guess so. Can you name any such client? Dillo and likely others on: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_lightweight_web_browsers and clients for RTEMS and other embedded platforms supported by newlib, musl, and similar libraries, that are too limited to support TLS, HTTPS, etc. -- Take care. Thanks, Brian Inglis, Calgary, Alberta, Canada This email may be disturbing to some readers as it contains too much technical detail. Reader discretion is advised. -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple