X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:message-id:subject:from:to:date:in-reply-to :references:content-type:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=default; b=FUk3It4eMwTgj1sP/RPmRyNDmCxFpWkHlWHIVOPm1kS Wr2Z6RBt+tseudIkB0QwDIb2SCtmM9e0QTD2JS4nivGGsW7Adk9ABTN3T6Eua2xA kRtRI4zr0pAcEe3FogBepx9OI5JtOjKyGughqCszh1XzZ/llRfKgGnp7+Vmkg5xc = DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:message-id:subject:from:to:date:in-reply-to :references:content-type:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; s=default; bh=gdAnQOpN1uqkbQDCSqWMHRE526Q=; b=dwehWU+EpDrwvW6Yc vMjV4nFneAjd11Te97rxbIqLsxpq6UV0HjmHStttFiOR2rB4ZZWq7hXyhS0fvpA8 wUS7bCzLXNlmaWwaPfb6r/XKiiglaSFY2RVC2eCD5n8JWwn5Kz85Su4VozUQ0U7X P5uc2NcGouxLbjwYoB10i7SdEo= Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-3.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KAM_NUMSUBJECT,SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=no version=3.3.1 spammy=painful, H*M:cygwin, penny, OpenSSL X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Message-ID: Subject: Re: OpenSSL 1.1 From: Yaakov Selkowitz To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Date: Sun, 10 Mar 2019 21:01:50 -0400 In-Reply-To: <5c8585ef.1c69fb81.3d93a.9e26@mx.google.com> References: <5c8585ef DOT 1c69fb81 DOT 3d93a DOT 9e26 AT mx DOT google DOT com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" User-Agent: Evolution 3.30.5 (3.30.5-1.fc29) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Sun, 2019-03-10 at 14:47 -0700, Steven Penny wrote: > Current Cygwin OpenSSL is 1.0.2r. However OpenSSL 1.1 has been available for > several years now: > > https://github.com/openssl/openssl/releases/tag/OpenSSL_1_1_0 We are well aware, and this delay was planned. 1.1 broke API compatibility and it took a while for dependent code to catch up. Since trying to support parallel installation of -devel packages for each is a bit painful (as you will soon see when we release 1.1), we decided to wait and let the ecosystem catch up to 1.1 first. -- Yaakov -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple