X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:date:from:reply-to:to:message-id:in-reply-to :references:subject:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=default; b=ytfkDKT0XUConQfX y0L7dlSKLvffkmg68yZRsKY+4YN+3vC3it1PMX2Uw39ow3c9oLmP3QNclNrv72Xs K9zIRPtv5X7KDq+YcB6MQZGsNeqz7UaABPnJBN58MkEkR94z8sovkS5JX5sTxJ5G lLrHU8UPPjmBZSAB9VFQXvtI+XA= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:date:from:reply-to:to:message-id:in-reply-to :references:subject:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; s=default; bh=3sYM28XNRHT76GAdOrP/4E +52uo=; b=WxWljmqp0k1wIiNX7rJ1bEXaIh3E4LO4nt72D625xaei8ms25o5kpw /RKDINJ5/jPPgzE5HMrROsv1h8uBZo53XzGdibzCkWuoJlg8JKJsjT2J00FKxmyu 1jFczG9mYdB5mup4Etp7HoN21XCUBTSr96niVWCL0SCVnFliUFiBc= Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-6.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,FREEMAIL_FROM,GIT_PATCH_2,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=H*r:NNFMP X-HELO: nh604-vm11.bullet.mail.ssk.yahoo.co.jp DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1551837178; s=yj20110701; d=yahoo.co.jp; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; bh=PYIq+x8blUhp7Pl7ZEraeQFWcjsDWEiPDg9ttwjzKcw=; b=GDGZ4ti7VxOrZ096uYfUSgYmVlx3olWIfCg7/yGwrNNmIgEk+bCr+Li0lggL/wnr scPAJ1sePNGQjzZUOrZom+HaJfTP/CTj5FRLI8fUBhnHeduwXcaKnKckr7AuABNJ9RA 3WQN5L6yZalib1X1XFGFTwu1rY/8g5jOHFnTrDFY= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=yj20110701; d=yahoo.co.jp; h=Date:From:Reply-To:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=XoN28Yi6uyUzV9IavShncarSp+NWnsFhRvyaOu0zBxhxqtC15qfjIqUOdnc4nwpn 2NhwtIFBQHpv5A2oS0o1FIhLvy0Z+ZMPrKfzALU+rRxSqUScWkgwKRzVoydnSx3LbM2 vzHtgLXImBEf1HoQ0RINhO8cFpd7h2kJlGSlY28s=; Date: Wed, 6 Mar 2019 10:52:56 +0900 (JST) From: Tatsuro MATSUOKA Reply-To: Tatsuro MATSUOKA To: Achim Gratz , Message-ID: <579393023.124390.1551837177029.JavaMail.yahoo@mail.yahoo.co.jp> In-Reply-To: <1869437449.2276597.1551834619821.JavaMail.yahoo@mail.yahoo.co.jp> References: <1439412702 DOT 1866573 DOT 1551653028041 DOT JavaMail DOT yahoo DOT ref AT mail DOT yahoo DOT co DOT jp> <1439412702 DOT 1866573 DOT 1551653028041 DOT JavaMail DOT yahoo AT mail DOT yahoo DOT co DOT jp> <0faa5fb55a0af4803fcdff786dba8be440355609 DOT camel AT cygwin DOT com> <1885179468 DOT 2217358 DOT 1551790639928 DOT JavaMail DOT yahoo AT mail DOT yahoo DOT co DOT jp> <87d0n586qw DOT fsf AT Rainer DOT invalid> <648344595 DOT 103002 DOT 1551831017801 DOT JavaMail DOT yahoo AT mail DOT yahoo DOT co DOT jp> <1869437449 DOT 2276597 DOT 1551834619821 DOT JavaMail DOT yahoo AT mail DOT yahoo DOT co DOT jp> Subject: Re: Patch request to qt 5.9.4 (Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Qt 5.9.4) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-IsSubscribed: yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id x261tEjr031846 ----- Original Message ----- > From: Tatsuro MATSUOKA  > To: Achim Gratz; cygwin > Cc: > Date: 2019/3/6, Wed 10:10 > Subject: Re: Patch request to qt 5.9.4 (Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Qt 5.9.4) > >>>   From: Achim Gratz > >>>   To: cygwin >>>   Cc: >>>   Date: 2019/3/6, Wed 04:24 >>>   Subject: Re: Patch request to qt 5.9.4 (Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Qt 5.9.4) >>> >>> T atsuro MATSUOKA writes: >>>>   I contacted with Enrico who tells me the patch that I have shown. >>> >>>   Yes, but that monkeys around the real problem.  What Yaakov is telling >>>   you is that there are two options and we don't know yet which one > we >>>   have to deal with. >>> >>>   If O_NONBLOCK is needed, but does not work correctly under Cygwin, > then >>>   that's a bug in Cygwin.  For this case, Corinna asks you to create > an >>>   STC that demonstrates the bug so it can be triaged without having to >>>   work with something as complex as the Qt terminal in Cygwin. >>> >>>   If on the other hand O_NONBLOCK is in fact not needed and just shows >>>   different behaviour on different systems without a bug in the >>>   implementation being present, then upstream should remove that > argument. >>> >>> >>>   Regards, >>>   Achim. >> >> Seeing ML archive that Enrico indicated, >> >> Re: select() and named pipes >> >> #include >> #include >> #include >> #include >> #include >> #include >> #include >> #include >> >> #define FIFONAME "/tmp/pipe" >> >> int main(void) >> { >>     int fd; >>     int nsel; >>     fd_set readfds; >>     FD_ZERO(&readfds); >> >>     if (mkfifo(FIFONAME, 0600) < 0) { >>         perror("mkfifo"); >>         exit(1); >>     } >> >>     fd = open(FIFONAME, O_RDONLY | O_NONBLOCK); >> >>     if (fd < 0) { >>         perror("open"); >>         remove(FIFONAME); >>         exit(2); >>     } >> >>     FD_SET(fd, &readfds); >>     do { >>         nsel = select(fd + 1, &readfds, 0, 0, 0); >>     } while (nsel == -1 && (errno == EINTR || errno == EAGAIN)); >> >>     if (nsel == -1) { >>         perror("select"); >>         exit(3); >>     } >> >>     if (FD_ISSET(fd, &readfds)) { >>         char buf[100]; >>         int status; >>         int count = 0; >>         printf("%d: ", ++count); >>         while ((status = read(fd, buf, sizeof(buf) - 1))) { >>             if (status > 0) { >>                 buf[status] = '\0'; >>                 printf("%s", buf); >>             } else if (errno == EAGAIN) { >>                     printf("\n%d: ", ++count); >>             } else { >>                 perror("read"); >>                 break; >>             } >>         } >>     } >> >>     close(fd); >>     remove(FIFONAME); >>     return 0; >> } >> >> >> >> As you wrote this is a issue of Cygwin issue. >> But As long as O_NONBLOCK does not work on Cygwin, Enrico's workaround > can >> be attached for qt. > > Apart from Qt maintainer accepts Enrico's patch, I will raise O_NONBLOCK > issue by another post. I have updated the cygiwn by setup because cygwin is updated to 3.0.1-1. The above code works with or without O_NONBLOCK. On cygwin 3.0.0, with O_NONBLOCK, the code does not work. Thus situation is changing. But connection of gnuplot to qnuplot_qt still fails. There seem to be Qt for Cygwin specific issue. I cannot narrow down the issue at this moment. I have to use Qt with debug symbols and gnuplot build with -g option and trace the behaviors. It take time and now I do not have enough time. Please wait while. Tatsuro -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple