X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:from:to:subject:references:date:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:content-type; q=dns; s=default; b=jWY1j ChEuzYV1u6cxeWkD7F1UCzbEf/3c5b2bLPW0WygfyuhW9mgde8iAV2CUBAwycMEP PGo19QCrx2hnqs4WMjdM3x3L3F8EfdUXey49GECzY39x9p3NIUAHR69yEssGt0p5 WNqPBkTt4otMEv+TyoBhGuAfNbhBojmCIQ73Xk= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:from:to:subject:references:date:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:content-type; s=default; bh=8nzt0cNT0EZ jur70k1FBVRsV2fU=; b=hBRq7WH39MFrkBbkZdWYP/Vsls5gI1gQ1AHTpADY5Lx 0KY8ubM/wjDdk9ntoi7iaBVKWIJl92EixrJonbsxvQnHue6RFx3utVrR2iREQkBL PkH3f6Hd0PPx2WNpzJZB0edk4l2g4yuWi4AWaTxN0wDvIZsbGOn2ZnxTBkUcaSkc = Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS autolearn=unavailable version=3.3.2 spammy=asks, Hx-spam-relays-external:ESMTPA X-HELO: vsmx009.vodafonemail.xion.oxcs.net From: Achim Gratz To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Patch request to qt 5.9.4 (Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Qt 5.9.4) References: <1439412702 DOT 1866573 DOT 1551653028041 DOT JavaMail DOT yahoo DOT ref AT mail DOT yahoo DOT co DOT jp> <1439412702 DOT 1866573 DOT 1551653028041 DOT JavaMail DOT yahoo AT mail DOT yahoo DOT co DOT jp> <0faa5fb55a0af4803fcdff786dba8be440355609 DOT camel AT cygwin DOT com> <1885179468 DOT 2217358 DOT 1551790639928 DOT JavaMail DOT yahoo AT mail DOT yahoo DOT co DOT jp> Date: Tue, 05 Mar 2019 20:24:07 +0100 In-Reply-To: <1885179468.2217358.1551790639928.JavaMail.yahoo@mail.yahoo.co.jp> (Tatsuro MATSUOKA's message of "Tue, 5 Mar 2019 21:57:19 +0900 (JST)") Message-ID: <87d0n586qw.fsf@Rainer.invalid> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Tatsuro MATSUOKA writes: > I contacted with Enrico who tells me the patch that I have shown. Yes, but that monkeys around the real problem. What Yaakov is telling you is that there are two options and we don't know yet which one we have to deal with. If O_NONBLOCK is needed, but does not work correctly under Cygwin, then that's a bug in Cygwin. For this case, Corinna asks you to create an STC that demonstrates the bug so it can be triaged without having to work with something as complex as the Qt terminal in Cygwin. If on the other hand O_NONBLOCK is in fact not needed and just shows different behaviour on different systems without a bug in the implementation being present, then upstream should remove that argument. Regards, Achim. -- +<[Q+ Matrix-12 WAVE#46+305 Neuron microQkb Andromeda XTk Blofeld]>+ Wavetables for the Terratec KOMPLEXER: http://Synth.Stromeko.net/Downloads.html#KomplexerWaves -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple