X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:date:message-id:from:reply-to:to:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type; q=dns; s=default; b=r0HZ8b 9+Hj2fccKBCLnrgJD2nK63zizdBCEAks12jXZCFskCnV+xEuFHXHGp2EYx1tNhj2 AvCVELQE9mntWXaH0StodLh2rUHd47bghFmyTUz4I45Jy94u8zjitz2vbSnoOVBu DyKcrrU56IYnxYcN+P2HrOy6m/6kN94fQkJSk= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:date:message-id:from:reply-to:to:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type; s=default; bh=6M06o7e8/M82 pz8jp1If5ZoPesE=; b=jgf/qRleAga9wuFh8sISQ/iCXkWmk43RUWmTZDGVkQnn oDWaLRjcLQD7wpbO8kmjWYaylN84uFRV9wlEMw/ANe2LZNoD4CX4EPl7boen1LP2 PLYoIVvk8JycFK0RxJxK+rUNipqo2Afg/qviiR+rse2zx0n4odPLNb+J4leZals= Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=forces, explain, searches, H*F:D*nl X-HELO: lb2-smtp-cloud9.xs4all.net Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2019 00:36:54 +0100 Message-ID: From: Houder Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: antrun versus wsl versus cygwin References: <0f26a1aa-7c70-5201-5212-5f3df54a50fa AT gmail DOT com> <1968849310 DOT 20190218020001 AT yandex DOT ru> In-Reply-to: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=fixed User-Agent: mua.awk 0.99 On Mon, 18 Feb 2019 13:15:02, Franz Fehringer wrote: > Am 18.02.2019 um 11:42 schrieb Houder: [snip] > > Now show us the output of an antrun script, where the executable > > is C:\Tools\Cygwin\bin\which and its argument: bash > > > > > > > > > gives > > [exec] /usr/bin/bash > [exec] W i n d o w s S u b s y s t e m f o r L i n u x h a s n > o i n s t a l l e d d i s t r i b u ti o n s . > [exec] D i s t r i b u t i o n s c a n b e i n s t a l l e d > b y v i s i t i n g t h e M i c r o s o f t S t o r e : > [exec] h t t p s : / / a k a . m s / w s l s t o r e > > It is as if C:\Windows\System32 were hardcoded somewhere > The ant exec documentation says > "The task delegates to Runtime.exec which in turn apparently > calls ::CreateProcess. It is the latter Win32 function that defines the > exact semantics of the call. " Erm, thinking this over ... you may be on the right track ... After invoking the Windows executable (JVM or whatever) from Cygwin, "bash" is started using CreateProcess() https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/desktop/api/processthreadsapi/nf-processthreadsapi-createprocessa Before it searches PATH, CreateProcess checks "the 32-bit Windows system directory" for the presence of "bash.exe". And we know that bash.exe from WSL is present in C:\Windows\System32. That does explain why the output of bash from WSL is shown, does it not? (reporting that a distribution is still to be installed). The above also explains why renaming bash from WSL to "wslbash.exe" forces CreateProcess() to search for the presence of bash.exe down the PATH. Henri -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple