X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=default; b=q87h6mVfDXHFrJcn 9QwPhxcsS1J46mTmjblqaQbImkP5N5Ovdx/Oz20i10cFdXJFX7xJApVUJGg5L13V HZLF7JOTRmTWlf0Q8BLe2zjZbFpk/q8P3PeMuET95mKsQjgLdpQttyn86s2IQpzr bn+p1+6+KHDn6QwtYWYId1KDY0k= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; s=default; bh=1nZuamKtDQWxEDJtSDrZQg 56inw=; b=HK3ky4YruuUeDldc0i7i+YRag4qZ975nFPEtei986imI8SMORtVfXF um3cNDjKyexnCPT8iS3RSPVKx4Px8NOnyj4LdnxAgi6T7n7Y/rDACUVhGm13T8r0 +r+PF9qcLPiPU8IGNRhq7wbBarV6CD8Br/MX6ELvjR8bRIt8+yQqE= Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-6.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,GIT_PATCH_2,KAM_SHORT,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=PATH, foreign X-HELO: atfriesa01.ssi-schaefer.com Subject: Re: portable use of dos2unix WAS: Re: textmode for stdout, what is "correct" now? To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com, Andrey Repin References: <739ed5ce-6902-d702-e152-65dc2c1da667 AT ssi-schaefer DOT com> <20190214162002 DOT GA4950 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <6aa280c2-4769-0772-91d9-c73a3a3d9680 AT ssi-schaefer DOT com> <20190215102251 DOT GA2702 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <1282767785 DOT 20190215154502 AT yandex DOT ru> <1787080198 DOT 20190215213542 AT yandex DOT ru> From: Michael Haubenwallner Message-ID: <997bbfcf-62a9-386e-ee3e-b32b5a08cc59@ssi-schaefer.com> Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2019 20:33:52 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1787080198.20190215213542@yandex.ru> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi Andrey, On 2/15/19 7:35 PM, Andrey Repin wrote: > Greetings, Michael Haubenwallner! > >> On 2/15/19 1:45 PM, Andrey Repin wrote: >>> Greetings, Michael Haubenwallner! >>> >>>>> >>>>> For scripting, d2u should help. >>> >>>> Plus, to be portable: type d2u >/dev/null 2>&1 || d2u() { cat; } >>> >>> _d2u="$( which d2u 2> /dev/null || echo cat )" > >> To be honest, this is less portable for some reasons: > >> * "$(...)" is not Bourne Shell (/bin/sh) but POSIX Shell (ksh, bash, ...) > > And /bin/sh is a POSIX shell. I don't know what you are trying to say here. > http://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/utilities/sh.html#tag_20_117 > http://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/utilities/V3_chap02.html#tag_18_06_03 Well, /bin/sh *shall* be a POSIX shell. But the reality is not there yet: https://www.gnu.org/software/autoconf/manual/autoconf.html#Portable-Shell >> * "which" is C Shell and has it's own troubles (may load ~/.cshrc first) > > $ which which > /bin/which > > It's a separate executable, unless shell provides an override. > How it could possible load foreign RC file is beyond me. On AIX for example, /usr/bin/which is a csh script by itself: $ type which which is /usr/bin/which $ file /usr/bin/which /usr/bin/which: shell script - csh (C shell) $ head -n5 /usr/bin/which #!/usr/bin/csh -f set prompt = "% " if ( -f ~/.cshrc) then source ~/.cshrc endif Now imagine what happens when ~/.cshrc does mess with PATH. Anyway: To find something along PATH, I do prefer some shell builtin rather than something to be found along PATH. > > ---- > > I have a different question though. The commands you presented in the OP > look like you aren't using Cygwin-suppied OpenSSL binary. This is true: The Cygwin distro does provide openssl-1.0.2p, but I'm building the *portable* Gentoo Prefix distro on Cygwin, with openssl-1.1.1a already. But whenever the Cygwin distro would bump to openssl-1.1, the same problem would arise there as well, just becomes noticed much later probably. /haubi/ -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple