X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:content-type; q=dns; s=default; b=WNQ6O6c kFcpIUpzuBSmcleBVSXO/RiDIB1I9yR7jWIEQ9dk6etkq+ltOs/MnnW5fYZvd60u d3869WvW9aRVaZK9UXipdooLLCJX0VEfU2Var3sN6MtJMHowXUiAvjOLwIgCRCZK XuvMjo+f3E4IYNL4DKqHnTQC0+I5ZFwn7yFU= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:content-type; s=default; bh=pP3yHUJ+ykHLY HRZAY1HaKXxTbI=; b=ncEGFsAXLkfM0MeHq57VZmp8gnd/0yxwpIYi2mSqit2PL 4CJTHiBt3d6KyPitefY8nnThY+ZjLTZ9bAs5pCNLZnPfuNQ7nW5rthT3Q2DvUkDN CY0z4PoPJCwuoDOrkv9udr0SQAOb8bSn5fxTq0An+AqBWCHp1PUYgMsaF4fy6M= Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=maintaining, bash, occasionally, H*c:alternative X-HELO: mail-it1-f180.google.com MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <86acdcb9-9067-0f55-2543-6d100aaa7cae AT gmail DOT com> <874lafey1v DOT fsf AT Rainer DOT invalid> In-Reply-To: <874lafey1v.fsf@Rainer.invalid> From: "E. Madison Bray" Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2019 23:15:54 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Cygwin Statistics and curiosity To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-IsSubscribed: yes On Fri, Jan 11, 2019, 21:31 Achim Gratz E. Madison Bray writes: > > I have often wondered why apt-cyg [1] hasn't been adopted fully by > > Cygwin as one of the default packages (in fact I'm not sure if there > > even is an actual cygwin package for apt-cyg), aside from the fact > > that it's not formally maintained as part of the cygwin ecosystem. > > Maybe it should be. > > For starters, apt-cyg and the handful of purported alternatives will > break your installation in subtle and not-so subtle ways. None of them > handle all postinstall actions correctly and all of them will fall over > if locked in-use files have to be altered or replaced. > I'm sure it has bugs, though it's always worked quite well for me. If I have experienced those bugs I'm not sure. I think it's possible but I'm also expert enough to usually resolve issues I've encountered on my own. At the most, I think I've had to occasionally run rebaseall after some package installs. I didn't realize its development history was such a hideous mess, especially considering that it's just a few hundred lines of bash script that I could probably rewrite myself. Personally I'd be happy to maintain it, especially if it were installed with Cygwin. Otherwise I'd just be maintaining yet another "unofficial" fork of it. Personally, I don't think a GUI program should be the only interface for installing new packages into cygwin* * modulo caveats such as using it to upgrade cygwin1.dll itself > -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple