X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:from:to:subject:date:message-id:references
	:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding
	:mime-version; q=dns; s=default; b=OGKWyNBNXBoU1UwqasVlEAQBtPhh+
	WQZurLFDyHj+M83Xm8dxCP3gLyYKSz7jMo0+1WvRFKtSYGhIKU/Cje5k3ak0J9Sq
	eHCCetW8QGQoxlLOLtYQ47b4dLVg7LKHq1QaGrPPSpIMCz4ymJ4rWyfhSW1aYAbb
	7C0reg8b7VZGqM=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:from:to:subject:date:message-id:references
	:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding
	:mime-version; s=default; bh=JShg+P0UMX/e7ZcS2mvR86l8s4M=; b=SwV
	11eCoPAsIUnsqJdw8XYldKHnPxymX8lzL0mSF96ouzL/xBQG1x5IRi3pg5RqhI46
	kuf3s3Q3gTln1mQtoAn397LXPKSfR+RnspZUMg2tmuOy+S8wJSCGRhvDKb+SqMES
	YGIbJcHAJid5OkZSA1XJIiLSzgx9abmSOFgHVmNA=
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,MIME_BASE64_BLANKS,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=H*RU:15.0.1395.4, Hx-spam-relays-external:15.0.1395.4, interest
X-HELO: cluster-d.mailcontrol.com
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=worksite.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector1-schaeffler-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=uU1091iUDBT5BBIHiCnUg8O0mzFgWLLObhObsy7kJOA=; b=n7/2zHXo5quxhNAU1CuaifnOiq+vR6i/TJvhRwgtlFiI0634WZAZyPd7h7AMJqJ4x+W86WTjeAjCGsvD4WKa11QpHeRN/PkNKwJ3Ta4AQ6XyHEztMCohwdx730i+tNlAbyOl2vLXsoVijGrgJPuEOotCT34WrGNXuhnnc0/IVck=
From: "Lemke, Michael  ST/HZA-ZIC2" <lemkemch AT schaeffler DOT com>
To: "cygwin AT cygwin DOT com" <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Subject: RE: Cygwin Statistics and curiosity
Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2019 16:40:01 +0000
Message-ID: <AM6PR03MB3558681C728C88C273A8C582BE850@AM6PR03MB3558.eurprd03.prod.outlook.com>
References: <86acdcb9-9067-0f55-2543-6d100aaa7cae AT gmail DOT com> <CAAD4mYgnuRwavk=hhr8mk7yWSNDAT5Q6h9kPO3uMwWu-asQtwQ AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <CAOTD34Z9doPr1wcZRy9uc7jauZf=nVJfmMNO9e2gbLvzEqKZCw AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <336971b1-df3d-64fc-f271-74db7b83c83e AT gmail DOT com> <AM6PR03MB3558D3278B77A7B27D769591BE850 AT AM6PR03MB3558 DOT eurprd03 DOT prod DOT outlook DOT com> <20190111162940 DOT GZ593 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de>
In-Reply-To: <20190111162940.GZ593@calimero.vinschen.de>
authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=lemkemch AT schaeffler DOT com;
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: schaeffler.com does not designate permitted sender hosts)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-MailControl-OutInfo: MTU0NzIyNDgwNjpGUEtleTEucHJpdjpQHuBf59XRcNHs7kFdtFQxypdmZv2FyCGOkN4GjVk9gw+m+Nwke7YkE4Vy+HZzbjw4e7nV5Z6dIjdj0HR0sFdq4piC9w8cLMpDulSjkog63/C4dp9B7SZqQNzs9BzpJFtHucDTUHMVrFkQVm+fCNSpIfBGn8vl6kt3b5/SfHok7nDHzpoZu/kRxQ4XhV0GIMX5QoC7vOiCvWwZMp2LyVj6W5Ufu8/+saG0ioCay1NULm0jpb7sY3jtlOQM19ihZDfUxzFBNnJokto2DxYu90/YrUB1+cIQVVLXK74JC9ot3HvBrpIduQ9UffjeG0ReQlGhsgNDGoZIGHrFbhfddtLu
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from base64 to 8bit by delorie.com id x0BGeJAw004410

On Friday, January 11, 2019 5:30 PM Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>On Jan 11 16:15, Lemke, Michael  ST/HZA-ZIC2 wrote:
>> On Friday, January 11, 2019 3:50 PM David Dombrowsky wrote:
>> >On 1/11/19 8:40 AM, E. Madison Bray wrote:
>> >> I have often wondered why apt-cyg [1] hasn't been adopted fully by
>> >> Cygwin as one of the default packages (in fact I'm not sure if there
>> >> even is an actual cygwin package for apt-cyg), aside from the fact
>> >> that it's not formally maintained as part of the cygwin ecosystem.
>> >> Maybe it should be.
>> >
>> >YES PLEASE!  Cygwin is awesome and this would put it firmly into the
>> >first class of required windows programs/systems.
>> 
>> It's dead:
>> 
>> https://github.com/transcode-open/apt-cyg/blob/master/status.md
>
>If somebody is willing to maintain apt-get as package in the Cygwin
>distro, which includes keeping it running if setup.exe changes, fixing
>bugs as required(*), by all means,  go ahead.
>
>Are you volunteering, by any chance?

My reply was only meant as a hint, I have no interest in the package,
but someone (who is on this list I believe) already did:

https://github.com/cup/sage/issues/20


--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple