DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:to:from:subject:message-id:date:mime-version
	:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=default; b=EgU
	Yp6WbNpNfsa4kJhXMhcpLI6z93ox1PYvXurV8vUx6wsIgML8mzO+gSHwtJkBNq5c
	EJmYwNs5FRQFvce7ogrJt9YL0x8AzZswu5/RfPHi5CMxTnqIXkckVTSNyZynvZE1
	4xcjVTiiYs4z7PCBpq+eizfWXNGROS9gZiQYPj6k=
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
From: Greywolf <greywolf AT starwolf DOT com>
Subject: bdftopcf: mis-classified?
Message-ID: <0cfaa1ff-091b-3e24-daba-7047ee9212f1@starwolf.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2018 15:36:55 -0800
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.3.3
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Greetings,

I went to install bdftopcf (X11 font compiler), and was somewhat surprised to 
find that it was not present under the X11 category; moreover, I was somewhat 
more surprised to find that it was included under the Debug category.

Considering the presence of some packages in more than one category, I might 
entreat that you present bdftopcf under X11 in addition to Debug, as, for 
anyone designing a bitmapped terminal font (which is substantially easier to 
design than a TTF font), it's not really primarily a debugging application.

				Seasoned Greetings,

				--*greywolf;

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple