X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:date:from:reply-to:message-id:to:subject
	:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type
	:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=default; b=P8wxOzVn549CoDsR
	Dvpd/V8PuyfM9ChjAixmrPQnOP8tFEBaDAJFWIake6fXrISI9q72K5AjcnMS8jaQ
	zdXmq+xSrkv1o/qjVwWUHoc/HZlG8QNFGKLaXjc46KNq189S3XZi8aMOglpjvv7a
	X49LK2IFCG7/I/rkioq/1CcvLqM=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:date:from:reply-to:message-id:to:subject
	:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type
	:content-transfer-encoding; s=default; bh=LCFYLz9XBZvYMlG4eO2PMB
	b8ViI=; b=yoSwM+eUczk3eR+NJ8m5v5be2iAdahPRVTUDimLIR3iQrLJP+qMXdz
	ZlnBdCxci6xOZDYFNdFStLxQoz9Gys1sJQ37C5qogi5QV0MyupVk938W5SbW8U47
	faJZu6dl7xap7QIoq6U1k9soTzX/Dpe67pP3sL1/XVJy6gLfv1wnM=
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,KAM_THEBAT,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS autolearn=no version=3.3.2 spammy=UD:yandex.ru, english, HX-Priority:Normal, wednesday
X-HELO: forward106p.mail.yandex.net
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yandex.ru; s=mail; t=1534928702;	bh=tAEeN8yD3lRtz1AicRert5ixVFm11Xq9/izCa4tPtyE=;	h=Date:From:Reply-To:Message-ID:To:Subject:In-Reply-To:References;	b=cH2cpD4f3qSicCQomh2DqJPC9N3ylICRWVDtznooDrldZXGOPOvUeCRL3A8J+m33A	 87vuAg7ZppjSS16WviYLgiKISDNRe7h055bfFT8oTLCEczm0nFQ92IJEruwBWtKKRq	 dDYqXCXsz1BTGuXLuzJ03s+UR5RohUzv9q0vyeZ8=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yandex.ru; s=mail; t=1534928701;	bh=tAEeN8yD3lRtz1AicRert5ixVFm11Xq9/izCa4tPtyE=;	h=Date:From:Reply-To:Message-ID:To:Subject:In-Reply-To:References;	b=Y94YX5jhVXPrhagh9Fxjispthb+1Vo1tgS47o7M3IPgXc5LMT2g2LVUbOCITcwTN2	 MDdZOFmsGv5u+nJagnhYcVHkN7i5bwBQ1UPD1e1ddpoHWkhhq+94ON2AYw89xDtork	 QpIAxFanNi1DP2+eA1nGEmPR8ptqIvluR9Bbc7R0=
Authentication-Results: smtp4p.mail.yandex.net; dkim=pass header.i=@yandex.ru
Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2018 12:02:37 +0300
From: Andrey Repin <anrdaemon AT yandex DOT ru>
Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Message-ID: <268692389.20180822120237@yandex.ru>
To: cyg Simple <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>, cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: gettext - acl tests - cygwin specific code path
In-Reply-To: <5f3f087a-bbf3-c99f-cdd2-ba876b09d876@gmail.com>
References: <20968a92-9900-5fd0-807c-29facf8b84de AT gmail DOT com>   <05c3ca13-c103-ae7d-e727-a995a4cf5f66 AT gmail DOT com>  <42935325 DOT 20180821231318 AT yandex DOT ru>  <5f3f087a-bbf3-c99f-cdd2-ba876b09d876 AT gmail DOT com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-IsSubscribed: yes

Greetings, cyg Simple!

> On 8/21/2018 4:13 PM, Andrey Repin wrote:
>> Greetings, cyg Simple!
>> 
>>> During the testing at least one of the tests does `setfacl -m group:0:1
>>> tmpfile0`.  Obviously this gets a 'permission denied' error as group 0
>>> doesn't exist.  What do you suggest for reasonable replacement for 0?
>> 
>> Nothing. Not all systems have a concept of "group 0". Just skip this test.

> I'm not interested in skipping the test; after all the path for the test
> is Cygwin specific.

Then contact the author of these tests and find out what they were thinking
creating them.

> It's just not the correct thing to do for the Cygwin specific path.

That's exactly what I said.
This is just not the right thing to test under Cygwin.

> I believe 11 to be the correct test and will pursue that upstream.

I strongly suggest learning the original intent of the test, before any
"pursuit".

> Marco suggested maybe 544(Administrator) but that doesn't work with a
> typical user build while doing the same in Linux for root group 0 as a
> typical user I would need to have elevated privilege in Windows to use 544.


-- 
With best regards,
Andrey Repin
Wednesday, August 22, 2018 11:59:44

Sorry for my terrible english...


--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple