X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:reply-to:subject:to:references:from:message-id :date:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=default; b=ZjgVgYVpZsCYYKzR WtyhVLRxZIF/nb1zNE8fIqD3v0ZpyyGBRI0QHesF9FnpH67Piy+8FYzDEY6fDXYU kpfR8JQiTX5HMHjCoH+Kozr/pXdqtXaF+zB75GNoNZ+ryzHigxXIkLmLg5AhHvC+ /5k6hoBBz9etL9RrRSXsFQFt1SI= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:reply-to:subject:to:references:from:message-id :date:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; s=default; bh=gLEXrV6qNfLr/nrmPGKpO9 K7Wh4=; b=qnLeaIZGUVMkk4deOnb/hDuA9sl2TRw2gkSIwnhgZl1Y72TH1SJp8/ Bi3f1E41thRK2FvfwWApKU5xbwS1MnUnV/9u//ySLoSfuoe6RPHudSpxbnCa5ETP 5bi30ytywDgH3m+hb59Efxw6oUcIObyTY8wMB7DBZl9t2WeSjlwY4= Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=no version=3.3.2 spammy=Brian, brian, Standard, Stephen X-HELO: smtp-out-so.shaw.ca Reply-To: Brian DOT Inglis AT SystematicSw DOT ab DOT ca Subject: Re: strtod ("nan") returns negative NaN To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <20180814132301 DOT GX3747 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <5b730d82 DOT 1c69fb81 DOT f063b DOT d706 AT mx DOT google DOT com> <8636vgac6e DOT fsf AT gmail DOT com> <06e75f75-6a5f-2140-7557-849290225f79 AT redhat DOT com> From: Brian Inglis Openpgp: preference=signencrypt Message-ID: <2b30e006-1679-791d-bb0e-9d7949fe005d@SystematicSw.ab.ca> Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2018 11:24:41 -0600 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.9.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <06e75f75-6a5f-2140-7557-849290225f79@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes On 2018-08-14 15:44, Eric Blake wrote: > On 08/14/2018 04:31 PM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: >>> The C standard disagrees with you [ISO:IEC 9899:2011, section 5.2.4.2.2]: >>> "An implementation may give zero and values that are not floating-point >>> numbers (such as infinities and NaNs) a sign or may leave them unsigned. >>> Wherever such values are unsigned, any requirement in this International >>> Standard to retrieve the sign shall produce an unspecified sign, and any >>> requirement to set the sign shall be ignored." > Cygwin is indeed buggy for turning "NaN" into -NaN; that's easy enough to fix. > The remaining question is whether it should turn "-NaN" into -NaN; and the > argument that glibc JUST fixed their bug 23007 to make strtod("-nan") return > -NaN means that Cygwin should, indeed, preserve the negative sign bit when > parsing "-nan". > https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23007 > So, the desired behavior: > strtod("nan") -> NaN > strtod("-nan") -> -NaN > printf("%f", NaN) -> "NaN" > printf("%f", -NaN) -> "-NaN" > and similarly for float and long double and wcstod, wcstod, wcstold functions. -- Take care. Thanks, Brian Inglis, Calgary, Alberta, Canada -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple