X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to
	:references:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
	 q=dns; s=default; b=kfWD+qsnVzxV10uXkesDmJftCw0ta7SSakLLcJWA+6l
	HZD5l5+u5/RPSfzINUgDF9f3fvnunifDO+7aizAqJkaSz6aEpJe3rR8hyaL4bgcU
	hDt+nN1j5C/DrLnM/HCzaEqpRQ30Pp4ylN/Jj3aqDSx6/ks2EUjIxs686xNAloaM
	=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to
	:references:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
	 s=default; bh=flUQ5/LMo6LlURYVRMqIkyfhNds=; b=nIPOf1Ue0cuxbJh43
	WIrMRujW1mPgYeRDJM0cYNRw6Ql6cJyZ6w309Va3IvYqfawbxr8YhwHsb6Z0XujU
	Xo3L61cgwdmR+9sf+NsU51YdzlBDKTm34TLf+gW27cPD4WkOitDgTXZ4++Btw6iq
	TFtVkjHo0ISD47ECJK96/7yMIw=
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found: No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=Hx-languages-length:447
X-HELO: conssluserg-03.nifty.com
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.10.3 conssluserg-03.nifty.com w5PBKM3j016874
X-Nifty-SrcIP: [125.3.30.127]
Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2018 20:20:26 +0900
From: Takashi Yano <takashi DOT yano AT nifty DOT ne DOT jp>
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: Date field of ls -l command is garbled in latest cygwin1.dll snapshot.
Message-Id: <20180625202026.1453eb53317e6ee6d66a088e@nifty.ne.jp>
In-Reply-To: <20180625091432.GD28757@calimero.vinschen.de>
References: <20180623024737 DOT 95cb452e6e9541eb05393983 AT nifty DOT ne DOT jp>	<20180623053927 DOT 1e57462e18394d13c71cf3fd AT nifty DOT ne DOT jp>	<20180623055913 DOT 808b584540e5f33ab164b16c AT nifty DOT ne DOT jp>	<20180623080659 DOT 27e779440448629b512928f6 AT nifty DOT ne DOT jp>	<b6e770ed-1129-f6fa-7319-cafde8ca9b31 AT SystematicSw DOT ab DOT ca>	<f94533e8-8e21-d9a9-15f1-4fdd97fec98a AT towo DOT net>	<ee8da875-20a2-1aec-3e77-e479455fba62 AT towo DOT net>	<20180625091432 DOT GD28757 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-IsSubscribed: yes

Hi Corinna,

On Mon, 25 Jun 2018 11:14:32 +0200
Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> Takashi, does your patch on cygwin-patches take this into account?
> 
> I think Thomas has a good point here, the generated files should
> always match a single version.

I submitted a new patch taking that point into account to cygwin-patches.

Thanks.

-- 
Takashi Yano <takashi DOT yano AT nifty DOT ne DOT jp>

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple