X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:reply-to:subject:to:references:from:message-id :date:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=default; b=adg9Ning8YMtvDFr 5C4EJkGm91CJHvZE+Vyn8mnUBAk6UVss0p/UOizTVHOtBfjrWw8N9aWSnSA1hr2p MUndF4exZa0K9tvMUPphtICElu3m71fli8iGnkC/TFYwUJCYidMII18vPxrs0Z4H 3YOeJ+fEJJ2ejGyV8Jy/Wob86l4= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:reply-to:subject:to:references:from:message-id :date:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; s=default; bh=Oc9XJbnZR87h3ropjRsts2 5oGwE=; b=SB/Sbt/gHzMz59hNjAzPuE7JegB3Hi8jsuRAozt6kMfFXS1JrY/3TA 3GOE5OQcpiSzveeCosjeWcp6DE3GeL+1B44ijHJPolJkw5K6V1T5o/mQxknTTJbU 454k88w8SkVQcPf6rgJKt9UHjLNozq8Zv2OUhggiAevPT/LKrtxJ4= Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=no version=3.3.2 spammy=sk:newlib, H*R:D*ca, unanswered X-HELO: smtp-out-no.shaw.ca X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.3 cv=PvS9kTE3 c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=MVEHjbUiAHxQW0jfcDq5EA==:117 a=MVEHjbUiAHxQW0jfcDq5EA==:17 a=IkcTkHD0fZMA:10 a=w_pzkKWiAAAA:8 a=y02T-5JlmxM5BQrndpAA:9 a=QEXdDO2ut3YA:10 a=31m6tEx5sAIA:10 a=l4lHiSdNQNsA:10 a=sRI3_1zDfAgwuvI8zelB:22 Reply-To: Brian DOT Inglis AT SystematicSw DOT ab DOT ca Subject: Re: Problematic interpretion of paths starting with double slashes To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <00de90b8-a2b4-f751-1ef2-05645a3f1119 AT SystematicSw DOT ab DOT ca> From: Brian Inglis Openpgp: preference=signencrypt Message-ID: <5b7147ce-774d-f034-ac40-c368aa1cab9f@SystematicSw.ab.ca> Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2018 11:41:52 -0600 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-CMAE-Envelope: MS4wfNlKwrXl7psUsZjry3JNOuq2TFn7ugctORQo7oJ+FL90Ch+qW4j+v4szc032vIlF0of8/2wgN0NmCm3377/wi+M7SWt8fWEMKYCOzaQ6U39tHLw/fjEs YQ2Ys0jcA2lGqjQCuE8dmhcwtiyiJE11s6IN4wgpduu02UGsz0mXyFEgHAKSK4CXaOaMFAPSH7LFMg== X-IsSubscribed: yes On 2018-06-13 02:34, Sven Eden wrote: > However, from my two questions, one was answered, and I can > figure out the other just fine by myself. > Q: Can the handling of // be extended to check for / if the > first fails? > A: Yes > Unanswered: Is the relevant stuff to be found in winsup/cygwin? Look at: https://cygwin.com/git/gitweb.cgi?p=newlib-cygwin.git;a=blob_plain;f=winsup/cygwin/fhandler_netdrive.cc;hb=HEAD -- Take care. Thanks, Brian Inglis, Calgary, Alberta, Canada -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple