X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:date:from:to:subject:message-id:reply-to :references:mime-version:content-type:in-reply-to; q=dns; s= default; b=D54XoQHc/4cQ6A+REQwCjPtWLYOrUj1RiyhMDIwrZCukCLMKg7Cso c+k6tawfnPbJ2PhebiLL9lQLXrILLkDzxozaiFZP2qSCbYqoBa5TQPyGWvwcVkHN dWq2bumeGV27Y3rtJeI3cC6ofC/qntSrElNTVM5PsU+urOEBeP71mI= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:date:from:to:subject:message-id:reply-to :references:mime-version:content-type:in-reply-to; s=default; bh=Hf3kv7eQ5yrXgvyG1QHI2pnIwZc=; b=mYh0Nhg5eKJSG0u5BtBL0Z4CT3uh /TseKFDvSJHC3iFaJRY9tI0vjoDOxzxepOEVESFg/bAg9MlJNy5NmggqUwrO3fnG Ler56jRgmYJzXsFkM2kff/0BF0obRYrye9eW1XOzl8BVHdTNvr8aO4dx2ue3AH7i PcLLnHYq+LB1Jko= Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-101.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,GOOD_FROM_CORINNA_CYGWIN,KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=ACK X-HELO: mout.kundenserver.de Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2018 10:09:53 +0200 From: Corinna Vinschen To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Aw: Re: Problematic interpretion of paths starting with double slashes Message-ID: <20180613080953.GR7851@calimero.vinschen.de> Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <87efhbdbaz DOT fsf AT Rainer DOT invalid> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="bKyqfOwhbdpXa4YI" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87efhbdbaz.fsf@Rainer.invalid> User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.2 (2017-12-15) --bKyqfOwhbdpXa4YI Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Jun 12 22:01, Achim Gratz wrote: > Sven Eden writes: > > Doing a simple stat on / if (and only if) the UNC lookup > > fails, does not endanger anything. It wouldn't break > > anything or do any other damage. Besides from adding an > > additional <0.01s lag to any failed access that *really* > > meant a network share. > > > > So no. Adding this tiny extra functionality wouldn't break > > anything for anybody, but allowed the usage of software that > > relies on the non-cygwin behaviour. (And is outside the > > users control.) >=20 > Well, it does break things if both >=20 > //this/or/that > /this/or/that >=20 > exist and then at some point host "this" becomes unreachable. So I'd > keep //unc/path to mean just that on principle. ACK Corinna --=20 Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Maintainer cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Red Hat --bKyqfOwhbdpXa4YI Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCAAdFiEEoVYPmneWZnwT6kwF9TYGna5ET6AFAlsg0VAACgkQ9TYGna5E T6AcKg//Xq69vEQkGcYe4/+g34xQBM3/0eNAdVggLzM3rL40I2dX7SuRjwH/MCmr U7Avgwc/qATxdGyQKev3cqhVqdFCOm3s1a6cUYLZKCvzTH7EUqhhlpwuLV8K0tRD +ogrG4d6aG4q5jL97IcIuTO0qylt+wnwJpaFsBW2THWBIld7ig3DQBoDW62kz8se egV9uDJxnr5ikpmbCbmfrZ3Ha13UJ7C7n7gq77R3TsDte+ccwbMyNvlwVe2g1wES 0BH/OEIy6Nl9wJRaN8y6We2cNB1nGPOjcU9xHSaf13dbp/ZGWfL7B72iiZPtbu02 kOSsPu8A7F7eMdWUPya8po/vjO2qmMn/LO+z0OJih9rSpJJRYGCrJLpbzad/NfXQ vAH5iy6BBiElSGLkRfZ6pVg1QwixsXg/EbDgb4rRK+u2mJvZ4zMA13pU7T0C7nfY P3IwLe7TMLlRutMUWzN0Sz5f+LZ8KnZ6/vPMSUJERhnjy1+AM91qbTrK6o5rxoqu fTGJrQSDtqK3nWufUoWhBfHJmGWvHpCfa60/Zxu1kajlKPa5YL6iNz4HXPaA9C4Y mWSld2KeAn2jZrP46l9hrvrpKHoE+pdLTwVsZm6KX3Ql0pEOZrgJI3eAjKiwV4hC xu+BGulyEwQfP6yZ3AK1qSWw6WVXJZMY7t3A8XJ0PwnBq9siTM0= =eSmQ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --bKyqfOwhbdpXa4YI--