X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:from:to:subject:references:date:in-reply-to
	:message-id:mime-version:content-type; q=dns; s=default; b=XWv1z
	/GuuSTEQH3yFIP9EXDuqVo9Tc6+tDByk6VQy+vru98fSVA4ygNEkrATFGtAhbnmT
	PIDoIHiJ9qlR5PoeKk+BBVH4cbRebsRHXilgDbFO6Ye9lBI75BhyqZ1Shb+ZuHq5
	KBriCVlkRrbIlULsNlkqL/ryNIfOWzSVVNSpek=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:from:to:subject:references:date:in-reply-to
	:message-id:mime-version:content-type; s=default; bh=3Oj45/8ZqhD
	2RMiBXrYTkr/lVRE=; b=DnA7QDG+4VBxVGcFDHD9F9S2Rc+KUtHPBqh+ln6aKTT
	wNolmev3NDK5KutfwkT2vgopPyeT6QcUBloY4JaZ1CmjyVf0ilEFLHOGV5MnHw9A
	iW9QsbSqzpejPoGjNR2j2nmzzG1bXwbv5iIRHxciBjc01THOXTWZBiipvaDMWpiA
	=
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found: No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=Hx-spam-relays-external:ESMTPA
X-HELO: mx009.vodafonemail.xion.oxcs.net
From: Achim Gratz <Stromeko AT nexgo DOT de>
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: Aw: Re: Problematic interpretion of paths starting with double slashes
References: <trinity-82173dac-d842-4a87-8d1f-bed9a958d178-1528793630066 AT 3c-app-gmx-bs08>	<dc8418d2-2004-97f0-2d8c-ab438f007eba AT redhat DOT com>	<trinity-2aa37c55-032a-4631-9d8f-657ecd85e170-1528809265158 AT 3c-app-gmx-bs08>
Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2018 22:01:08 +0200
In-Reply-To: <trinity-2aa37c55-032a-4631-9d8f-657ecd85e170-1528809265158@3c-app-gmx-bs08>	(Sven Eden's message of "Tue, 12 Jun 2018 15:14:25 +0200")
Message-ID: <87efhbdbaz.fsf@Rainer.invalid>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.3 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
X-VADE-STATUS: LEGIT

Sven Eden writes:
> Doing a simple stat on / if (and only if) the UNC lookup
> fails, does not endanger anything. It wouldn't break
> anything or do any other damage. Besides from adding an
> additional <0.01s lag to any failed access that *really*
> meant a network share.
>
> So no. Adding this tiny extra functionality wouldn't break
> anything for anybody, but allowed the usage of software that
> relies on the non-cygwin behaviour. (And is outside the
> users control.)

Well, it does break things if both

//this/or/that
/this/or/that

exist and then at some point host "this" becomes unreachable.  So I'd
keep //unc/path to mean just that on principle.


Regards,
Achim.
-- 
+<[Q+ Matrix-12 WAVE#46+305 Neuron microQkb Andromeda XTk Blofeld]>+

Samples for the Waldorf Blofeld:
http://Synth.Stromeko.net/Downloads.html#BlofeldSamplesExtra

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple