X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=default; b=MdpdtKlHHyvu5LAR YhKD25fJCXaVsaAqbfyRqUTBBwLl3/q8hP+jvL03Gl5btGNpvIx974WPffEQwB+4 gh3vv6K/4ejZgt7lUHgCFdf2Qe6d7faHWHnxgFm8g1oYTAlvrTaSGd5kBtruN4sN yUp+/3h+jhR5zDWCQyPNaVZHVQg= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; s=default; bh=GgXnlUuWPbj6tmHRK3YfjK nSyRs=; b=cLiw06LWkceIGuCffhjt/wKIVFTNh7DSOvw7l3rar/Ur4N3LN5Q4CA VLctywl5XghJl1ZBGw+X4lFtGn3hBZQBjeuGR8SJq/ZLUYaGL+PsFMHPNfnNoQwf /HJm6BNg41CrBpCiioo4a1yaGZNeQR2WRBaLo2LVzqoIkOpCpGn20= Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=H*Ad:U*allen, perfect X-HELO: endymion.arp.harvard.edu Subject: Re: Spam On List To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: From: Norton Allen Message-ID: <1bfe37ea-ccfb-b309-f85f-8065914e0a84@huarp.harvard.edu> Date: Fri, 18 May 2018 19:59:18 -0400 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes For what it's worth, I think I have a pretty good spam filter, and these ads for mailing lists always seem to get through, so they aren't particularly easy to catch. On 5/18/2018 5:03 PM, Erik Soderquist wrote: > On Fri, May 18, 2018 at 4:50 PM, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote: >> There is. It's not perfect. Depending on how it's tweaked, either we get >> false positives or some spam makes it through. It goes back and forth and >> right now it seems were on the latter side. > Personally, I much prefer some getting through rather than false > positives... being an eternal cat&mouse game, no spam filter will > ever be perfect... > > -- Erik > > -- > Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html > FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ > Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html > Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple > -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple