X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date
	:message-id:subject:to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
	 q=dns; s=default; b=nYLxYFJ1FIUxuiX601VzQDCFGUYnYnO7j8ipZBplsUh
	FVXjl6T4r1yRiQkT95gE23g5LcNsia6YKjf8Juar6djuzqDx4MyC2s2R962UgoBE
	12JF8HeCKurL+OjlKfIgbUflI1P6LWa6rR5qqzr0gi7TAYnaObSYEyedU21w8jNM
	=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date
	:message-id:subject:to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
	 s=default; bh=WXqyFWiyOKHuXQXZMf1okjuSoD0=; b=IW5wTaWg+CBm5YedF
	JW0Z7i6P6wXkRGhueS2LPW2U23uShUIvqZzTQ9xCIP62cSVXfuTj+25MEN19nXaj
	fp5IncBVNVcUfqVpX6nkDlTY2Dzh7ZfRP1Din3/kCVXckfDUVwb4no1ueP0gbpxf
	ct5o9BsIVgbqVsEU7XEgKSxo1c=
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found: No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,FREEMAIL_FROM,KAM_NUMSUBJECT,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no version=3.3.2 spammy=contractors, usg, waves, contractor
X-HELO: mail-it0-f51.google.com
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;        d=1e100.net; s=20161025;        h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date         :message-id:subject:to:content-transfer-encoding;        bh=yOqUADkSgY8uoTYnhf/8ZuYKs5neMIWn6AJfMk5l0NI=;        b=nfnAKC/d+xshR8Y+Pcr/2wAwsnrQvujRpGWAqP3A32sC6piED/MDhzZYp2sh9UpAXv         E2ZtRDV6BkCLjhfFvcBugv9OSzdFAJLjKi4Tei27yswnEVgfEfl5wgdM2VVZSdnF6VLM         t0U6dX7eYwmwiV0JLgAlbsynKDoOkHXEUK0UMBoojoBPT8nA1k+hvDIkADXrvdaT1XhP         U/hNqHURn1TURJhRwd1Jf+D/9vOfjbxQdShhi8rQ30r0rk/CRrdOFYM2qrrUHjaSgTtM         9dlTimTVvMFM9KAQ+TD/5xB7D3PvU8kIGd0Jl6c4IBmYA1Eyxfj7/4mv+iP+vNpdkxa4         v6Pg==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALKqPwfyDJXZylq7hwk5gl5XZG5Iwa1xizJvziNt510MywIEztouQdJq	YJd7HD9Psr3OxxxhJMu1TdvNAh0WFOfWUkBtJL8=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AB8JxZqgRFP4UyfzwC1VS8SjAjfw5zkNS1XsIDNh6Io0WL6n7TDc0l89/fSpWEatF1blURlOWUwc1JUHOW8noN3C748=
X-Received: by 2002:a6b:a583:: with SMTP id o125-v6mr11952260ioe.130.1526326154425; Mon, 14 May 2018 12:29:14 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <4c236fdb-c6c7-64a9-5a9b-4ee9d05b938b@gmail.com>
References: <BL0PR18MB23406D14CCAAD2600A1BD4F9DB9A0 AT BL0PR18MB2340 DOT namprd18 DOT prod DOT outlook DOT com> <18bf68cd-7681-2dcc-f360-252cbfeab7a7 AT t-online DOT de> <4c236fdb-c6c7-64a9-5a9b-4ee9d05b938b AT gmail DOT com>
From: Lee <ler762 AT gmail DOT com>
Date: Mon, 14 May 2018 15:29:13 -0400
Message-ID: <CAD8GWsvDRXLgdZHie9pxweiB-RPfx=vX-E+6Nh_GsdUhtMNskw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: CYGWIN 2.8
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id w4EKTLPj028895

On 5/14/18, cyg Simple   wrote:
> On 5/8/2018 3:28 PM, Hans-Bernhard Bröker wrote:
>> Am 08.05.2018 um 13:22 schrieb David Spencer:
>>> Morning,
>>>
>>> I am trying to get CYGWIN Version 2.8, this is the only version
>>> approved for our system at present,
>
> So your company is stating it wants to use buggy and susceptible
> applications.  I don't think so.

And I don't think you've ever experienced the joys of being a USG contractor :)

Go back to the original post & look at their email address.  I'm
betting they're a contractor.

>  Go back to the IT security team and
> state that 2.10 is the latest version of Cygwin and ask if it is okay.

Which is assuming that whatever person on the IT security team you ask
has the authority to override policy.  Staff _follows_ policy, they
don't make it.

> If not then ask them to provide you with a suitable version.

You seem to be under the impression that contractors are allowed to
make waves and stay employed there.

>> Providing that is, to a great extent, actually the job of whoever
>> approves versions of Cygwin for you.

I'd say it's the job of whoever came up with the policy of having an
'approved software' list in the first place to also come up with a
policy of keeping the list current but whatever..


It'd be nice to think the situation has changed in the years since I
was in the same position but apparently not.  What worked for me was
opening a support ticket with the group that keeps the approved
software list and asking what it takes to get the current version of
cygwin approved.

There's forms to be filled out, procedures to be followed, and in a
few weeks the current version of cygwin is on the approved list.

Regards,
Lee

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple