X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=default; b=SxfTJpy6dHV1VUD9qVonv7/nt4ZwA1V7oIipsK74dny lpp15Jb+7fdvm/intLeTtUUU9b63+hEkuQOdaFJ/JVlpqEpg3viLfJRyEZdvUJ/u Ge15DymQmgbr8E7AswRWuRmm6E6wQZdmhgwK5o/iW2FMiYoZRHUgxrNJwItegKzI = DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=default; bh=qmUKVV7H9FbkTqOTEOpgYRPqNiU=; b=wZZZx5BiM12kGNAG6 wLx7ybxpgczj7KzakPzYGoUQz/wB5ygaza34BSHwKdMhGkBq3G9FM6o1kASnKzvQ eJJpWB1KMnhN4xFWILKJ0uem2LEa7+/hSBUcN5khKuk+rFLPP9VgxrnvKJR/ipcO lHqGESu6XzCuU9IiFh0cBjdSUQ= Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-6.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,GIT_PATCH_2,KAM_NUMSUBJECT,KAM_SHORT autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=repin, Repin, versed, website X-HELO: Ishtar.sc.tlinx.org Message-ID: <5ACC18BF.4080904@tlinx.org> Date: Mon, 09 Apr 2018 18:51:59 -0700 From: L A Walsh User-Agent: Thunderbird MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Problem with NC.1.107 References: <1732290424 DOT 20180328171523 AT yandex DOT ru> In-Reply-To: <1732290424.20180328171523@yandex.ru> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Andrey Repin wrote: > Greetings, Jay Cotton! > > Since nc does not reply to --version, I have no way to tell if it's the same > you are running with. --- That's odd. But has to do with what version of ncat is run. I notice my linux machine says: > nc --version Ncat: Version 6.47 ( http://nmap.org/ncat ) But the version in cygwin: > cygcheck -f /usr/bin/nc nc-1.107-4 is very different. Not sure which is newer or better, but the version at nmap.org supports SCTP, though the BSD version supports QOS. Not sufficiently versed in either to know all the differences. Seems like the nmap.org version has more options: 44 vs. BSD's 28 (didn't double count switches from nmap that have a short+long form). Where do the sources from the BSD version come from? It doesn't seem to list a website. > >> The file permissions are messed up. --- I didn't notice this. > >> $ file /usr/bin/nc >> /usr/bin/nc: writable, executable, regular file, no read permission > >> I don't see the PE32+ executable (console) x86-64, for MS Windows >> string. --- weird -- when I tried that, got: > file /usr/bin/nc /usr/bin/nc: PE32+ executable (console) x86-64 (stripped to external PDB), for MS Windows >> here is the file in /usr/bin >> $ ls -l nc* >> -rwxr-xr-x 1 lbmgm lbmgm 24576 Mar 19 2013 nc.exe ---- Looks like the same file I have: > ll /usr/bin/nc -rwxr-xr-x+ 1 24576 Mar 19 2013 /usr/bin/nc* I'm not sure your file command is referencing the same file, since my ls shows the same size and date as yours, and clearly both show read+execute for U,G and other and write only for owner. >> I looked at the make file, it seems to be o.k. for generating a >> runable program. (uses gcc) but I don't have enough stuff installed >> to allow a build. --- I think something is wrong with your 'file' command. My nc-binary didn't come with a makefile (only binary & manpage): > cygcheck -l nc /usr/bin/nc.exe /usr/share/man/man1/nc.1.gz -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple