X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=default; b=J2qROhBsENr6ZfvbpXy6H6LuTyW6QDSUFFVNCAGKLxX 8ip4VpeFNsUtVaF3sVVUvlAUB7bAfdesPlZtW5Yh+R0XCUbj1dbuuQoevx5NqZsi n6fXy6lL4YgYMlNKZI2WpuQHxbfROZXp5apOgEvV0WEbbA1fRW4P5J8RaQxci5iU = DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=default; bh=Iu1Bq8wrKtinTQeLYxt+mduTVUU=; b=aIiYo3Pa94I7zYJ5U KW611KXTYtuFdVYeyS9vhAcXhEEfvgXHatVvTkw1y4l99ji/lT9wsDnBIdUpi+Lt Vr67cynYqxS6XEvByS4xd3ECKYXUMof9TNlF6fqTnyccVoIDDdLFsZ73mChrMv0K 7ZRDTqLyEwDZA/tzYyavRqKGJE= Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-5.5 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_05,GIT_PATCH_2,TIME_LIMIT_EXCEEDED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=unavailable version=3.3.2 spammy=H*r:192.168.3, 10g, 9000, card X-HELO: Ishtar.sc.tlinx.org Message-ID: <5AB5825C.8060309@tlinx.org> Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2018 15:40:28 -0700 From: L A Walsh User-Agent: Thunderbird MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: SSH/SFTP Network Performance? References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Jordan Geoghegan wrote: > > Has anyone ever successfully transferred 150Mbps or more over the > network using scp/sftp/rsync etc on Cygwin? ---- My experience was to use the cifs protocol as easiest (over local network). With a 10Gb (limited to 8Gb due to running on older PCIe interface) card, I'm getting: /h> bin/iotest Using bs=16.0M, count=64, iosize=1.0G R:1073741824 bytes (1.0GB) copied, 1.67486 s, 611MB/s W:1073741824 bytes (1.0GB) copied, 4.01592 s, 255MB/s That's on a Win7 client to a linux-samba server. If you want to get better results over SSH, you need to have a custom ssh that allows a null encryption for block transfers. See https://www.psc.edu/hpn-ssh. Encryption really slows things down. Also, on a local net, using Jumbo packets also helps (I have a 9000 mtu on my local net). -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple