X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:from:to:subject:date:message-id:mime-version
	:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=default; b=Tye
	29iBIGfPc631UJ5O6lXs4WvY4Z91DDlClqVTTmsdka+ni9Zn6nZvkos80Txbj1Oa
	h1GDUcDmFqcwhfZm2I8S2SpkRPWdl/tdjnMMl3u2y5kef2R2uAng8BA/CBIshBdn
	jTwGqsdoFJzzulu40xdtYuEQ/HeQirXGdUX9jCgw=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:from:to:subject:date:message-id:mime-version
	:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=default; bh=z7C0BoVbW
	1VolmsJo98oxTvbjwQ=; b=NqPNDuC6a0vtma1KkY/h6ikwqErScH1PM8Ug2qPKi
	Y4jh23llOGAlikodFxX2jNu7ZpPMjSEsc4SHw6UR92II/M+nuy+EKV3qVMalZ5C6
	dlKv04iyR6P8OaqbyvFAVtF38ELNuaBlyw+aoBg7KLDLtQV83+f7V5ZOW0/EzE1+
	a4=
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found: No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=1.5 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_20,RCVD_IN_SORBS_WEB,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=no version=3.3.2 spammy=H*UA:16.0, H*x:16.0, H*r:LOGIN, inadvertently
X-HELO: ppsw-30.csi.cam.ac.uk
From: "David Allsopp" <David DOT Allsopp AT cl DOT cam DOT ac DOT uk>
To: <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Subject: umask not working?
Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2018 12:48:46 -0000
Message-ID: <000f01d3bf80$a2e0d8c0$e8a28a40$@cl.cam.ac.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;	charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-IsSubscribed: yes

Is this expected behaviour:

OPAM+DRA AT OPAM ~
$ uname -a ; umask ; touch /tmp/foo ; ls -l /tmp/foo ; mkdir /tmp/bar ;
touch /tmp/bar/foo ; ls -l /tmp/bar/foo
CYGWIN_NT-6.1-WOW OPAM 2.10.0(0.325/5/3) 2018-02-02 15:21 i686 Cygwin
0022
-rw-r--r-- 1 OPAM+DRA OPAM+None 0 Mar 19 13:44 /tmp/foo
-rw-rw-r--+ 1 OPAM+DRA OPAM+None 0 Mar 19 13:44 /tmp/bar/foo

Why does the file /tmp/bar/foo get g+w when /tmp/foo doesn't - I'm not sure
what to look at on my system to diagnose what I may have inadvertently
tweaked. The directory itself is:

drwxr-xr-x+ 1 OPAM+DRA OPAM+None 0 Mar 19 13:44 /tmp/bar

Thanks!


David


--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple