DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:from:to:subject:date:message-id:references
	:in-reply-to:content-type:content-id:content-transfer-encoding
	:mime-version; q=dns; s=default; b=MjA3pldOGisc+ty93WBYvQHH4BDVt
	cV5INdgziurrdTOvW28K+4D6Gj4Yrm/MjQd26Phe3iuLT11QlA7vbIoWjKGaEXek
	p7C7nCaDcT9i1qtTC8wCEkpKfxWpYFzs95MDv97MGxTk0ktxXLlGjtuQuEG2KdEG
	ERUttrzkea6DXI=
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
From: Alejandro Benitez <BenitezAlejandroeepo AT outlook DOT com>
To: "cygwin AT cygwin DOT com" <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Subject: Re: Add emacs build with LUCID X toolkit ?
Date: Wed, 7 Mar 2018 15:03:56 +0000
Message-ID: <CP2P152MB179319AD5E49D712C4097ACAE1D80@CP2P152MB1793.LAMP152.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
References: <SC1P152MB17905AD0BCCAF5204BD6EF54E1DA0 AT SC1P152MB1790 DOT LAMP152 DOT PROD DOT OUTLOOK DOT COM> <161b043d-c083-758b-f7b0-aca675fe652d AT cornell DOT edu>
In-Reply-To: <161b043d-c083-758b-f7b0-aca675fe652d@cornell.edu>
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-tmn: [N7f5jU+EUKT6K8sSFFwQomHUON+5jMiJ]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1;DM3NAM03HT052;6:4EzcBLk5pTdO0W5b4VIXr4GWrns+1klC00lvfeKzOuydGiElHpd9F/aezneH3UIwbv8R1zkv2RPCkF5jjetU28FCTbyNn0MR5s3ZQZVCQQFBqgba3uHPUv44PaqJseFX/xnTnycErx9RGaMACB8zune0JY8SRd9jPYX/j2dXMsnJXLQHYFoK908jUwYzr9DwFkKaDKYDqjkWrvf7qqGXRVi9I0LBwx5f4TDGeEHytFNsUxNxSpXSyBuoabbWIn7NUmz4fmdV8yBQUpKBFkY1BUi9Fallm7R9lKTV0u79+rGboKSJRL9diXBPMm59fc0OXlfcfuVbQ+GF5IVcjv/VaGi4K0VVw2lVZmvkd1bu2tI=;5:keuWRiuk/gma/2LOoz6UItQiL8v77NdGWo8wf/63SbC+BqYgr0VXN6fD3NWAOzFmAEGJc6BKUi/nmOZ5IpVV9xhpdvX7JSgOpztynopQssB/R7SNuH0D6RJNApuB6X4JXc7Tm69R59lspMQcuSVqH6GgX9HDkgx2+hchAw1kjfs=;24:av+vz5ZfGrjCQmbTtq+ZuY8ZlgFJFmkI4FW4Ae9jkQn4sVotHyvRE9FIVDj+I+Tko5FOx2VvqwHolxE3EUWtYCQYa0cgA8ddIBkcOjXK/8k=;7:9NQKsgfXpcsxCY8pC7+zivm3rHFOcbbW8lb6DH96DYEb8Hlt2mJjW0YVDNWXtL3Uz/+3TMa+x6N+fzsUuKPpjiroJFfszenAHd8Q3ZC3IEnEVp0Gs/7lliN8jsTsJZcutNTlICxq3rE6wJeD5wgFH5JOA8fAojnKrpRNE8QaLkOdnJLpSqLZ2C3a8Tq848JB5ojgyqcCQTAZgXKWhaReMMnCTjm5V7UGt5tCGA5hW23JuXASFyXXG91J7ALNADe5
x-incomingheadercount: 46
x-eopattributedmessage: 0
x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:;BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:(7020095)(201702061078)(5061506573)(5061507331)(1603103135)(2017031320274)(2017031324274)(2017031323274)(2017031322404)(1601125374)(1603101448)(1701031045);SRVR:DM3NAM03HT052;
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: DM3NAM03HT052:
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: cb217161-b897-4826-732d-08d5843ca640
x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:(444000031);SRVR:DM3NAM03HT052;BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:;SRVR:DM3NAM03HT052;
x-forefront-prvs: 0604AFA86B
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM;SFS:(7070007)(98901004);DIR:OUT;SFP:1901;SCL:1;SRVR:DM3NAM03HT052;H:CP2P152MB1793.LAMP152.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM;FPR:;SPF:None;LANG:;
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: UMivHB6XqGyN6JWnX5KnZirbcHh8b8cjFwahuRhJUPv5fLVudCig4QQfQoYI+AszW1KJU/cFLnJJYdNlKc+JHsRqBr8DnFWIwiyxVSsKUR5gEtmKSNaBDWbq5TAjOayS+5NhcMM8rS4ghcGqmjTlhJWR1HVoZN6W3W+XbW1f0B1rPkiPAoWsVjZprQJQ9wX4
spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:99
spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <74D66ED7AF5D6E4BAA1730C2487898E9 AT LAMP152 DOT PROD DOT OUTLOOK DOT COM>
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: outlook.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: cb217161-b897-4826-732d-08d5843ca640
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 07 Mar 2018 15:03:56.8612 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Internet
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 84df9e7f-e9f6-40af-b435-aaaaaaaaaaaa
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: DM3NAM03HT052
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from base64 to 8bit by delorie.com id w27F4Bru024293

> vfork issues almost always indicate a need to do a full rebase.

Thank you. I really should have clarified that, I did try several rebaseall approaches to no avail. It seems this emacs build is a bit dated (March 2017) and might be linking to some dll files rebaseall is not honoring. I will post this or a related question in a new thread as soon as I can perform further tests. I just didn't want to wait to do the emacs build with lucid x toolkit suggestion.


El 05/03/2018 a las 11:03 a.m., Ken Brown escribió:
> On 3/5/2018 8:21 AM, Alejandro Benitez wrote:
>> Hi,
>> I often painstakingly work on my build of emacs and never look back, 
>> praying to never come back, but then I get some annoyances such as 
>> vfork issues I can't fix. I will go further on this in a different post.
>
> vfork issues almost always indicate a need to do a full rebase. See
>
>   https://cygwin.com/faq/faq.html#faq.using.fixing-fork-failures .
>
> Or switch from 32-bit Cygwin to 64-bit Cygwin, where such problems are 
> extremely rare.
>
>> Maybe add a new emacs-lucid package ?
>
> Cygwin's emacs uses GTK+ because that's the default for an emacs build 
> on all unix-like platforms.  But I'll think about adding an 
> emacs-lucid package for the next emacs release.  It would be good to 
> know how much demand there is for this.  Are there other emacs-X11 
> users who would prefer the Lucid toolkit?
>
> Ken
>
>
> -- 
> Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
> FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
> Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
> Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
>


--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple