X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:reply-to:subject:to:references:from:message-id
	:date:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type
	:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=default; b=nRD9nCb0f+ScZjqK
	Vb/vMf6+LL57tnxHikk9hDy4f659gpCXthFy/MMOafE9kf7Iit1jnytWWUpRPqHn
	mdGdqj41jJvcGNW4cBD+3egGPgKnSbNgmPhX+3U2ds3R4vc94PtuP1CF8/jeK90Z
	4NaK60Z6fbjwVVq/CL81bvut7n8=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:reply-to:subject:to:references:from:message-id
	:date:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type
	:content-transfer-encoding; s=default; bh=iVe5LSAEM57G3UjykX43Gi
	ApmxM=; b=skSxmcK/rFDecjU/LU1QpDOTEU3NYXCxJQ8U60iOpXQoLbq43UBpbK
	duD4oqGrsjcaLyR+62N+ZgTPj/cMoyHT7nMh452eqeG9npjQ8LgANPj4cIEKkgEg
	OMGctiDf6GcXC7WCxrD9vpr000zknhpYQtNdbgYM9McJFJC1QRKso=
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found: No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY,KAM_NUMSUBJECT,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=no version=3.3.2 spammy=dashed, SOME, Several, removable
X-HELO: smtp-out-so.shaw.ca
X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.3 cv=OeS28CbY c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=MVEHjbUiAHxQW0jfcDq5EA==:117 a=MVEHjbUiAHxQW0jfcDq5EA==:17 a=IkcTkHD0fZMA:10 a=tXNp_sQbAAAA:8 a=l_4hRoClYsFqPbaigcUA:9 a=QEXdDO2ut3YA:10
Reply-To: Brian DOT Inglis AT SystematicSw DOT ab DOT ca
Subject: Re: sed seems to force UC filename on Mixed 8.3 filenames on FAT32
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References: <CAKqBF1i+bdudLM7rCX1N-TPrmOPhOwY8NPB6ox1tJEXzZ35YuA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
From: Brian Inglis <Brian DOT Inglis AT SystematicSw DOT ab DOT ca>
Message-ID: <c2864b9f-b6e4-b5ae-a0b7-4e64f4bb76b5@SystematicSw.ab.ca>
Date: Tue, 6 Mar 2018 10:43:19 -0700
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAKqBF1i+bdudLM7rCX1N-TPrmOPhOwY8NPB6ox1tJEXzZ35YuA@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-CMAE-Envelope: MS4wfEsue/LPQUQcqX7IGSRWHeJhoIyAQtN54AY9FCnaO2h5SKMminN1RdNKYqS4B7MfmdDhzWWBWffYVTDCyGwCO1ll/ig4lb+WTvoJ/pzMFM8JUNrYN6jC pkXWitrv3Kukdr2d258Gjx+PihUjq+5O7d51FFpAYHh/mAxVU8hB25fgfGnB3pdKBRw4bw9UH4+WdA==
X-IsSubscribed: yes

On 2018-03-06 07:01, Fergus Daly wrote:
>>> I looked for recent similar issues and only found
> https://superuser.com/questions/1297658/folder-names-become-uppercase-when-syncing-to-fat32-drive

Have you checked that you get identical behaviour under cmd shell or PowerShell,
and see the problem using dir?
This would confirm that it is a file system problem and not the calls used.

>>> So if other users of this Win10 build start tripping on this same
>>> problem and reporting it, it may get looked at by MS.
> 
> The site you mention also asked about variations in hardware or
> formatting mechanism. I find the identical behaviour in USB drives
> (local) and USB sticks (removable). In the past I have used Hitachi
> Microdrive to render Removable sticks Local, but can't find a version
> of this driver upgrade for 64-bit. (Not one that works, anyway.
> Several that don't.) Also identical behaviours whether the filesystem
> is formatted FAT32 in Windows or formatted FAT32 in Linux.
> 
> So summarising:
> 
> SOME (but not ALL) file transactions on FAT32 result in
> 
> "Mixed case but no spaces 8.3" -> "ALL UPPER CASE 8.3"
> 
> Examples are sed and dos2unix (and family); but not nano, or joe. I
> can't think of anything that I could reasonably test on a folder
> rather than a file to see the effect on foldername.
> 
> Goodness knows how to upstream anything to MS.

Settings/bottom of page/Make Windows better/Give us feedback

> Finally, there was another Windows update yesterday, 05-MAR-2018: to
> version 1709 OS build 16299.251. Hopes of a return to correct
> behaviours were immediately dashed. :o(

-- 
Take care. Thanks, Brian Inglis, Calgary, Alberta, Canada

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple