X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:mime-version:content-type
	:content-transfer-encoding:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to
	:references:message-id; q=dns; s=default; b=TDReNRtxPv1VofPxNL7g
	0vmzBoT+6RS6hcv7T0Hdn4CQ4PdIc17UdTARxCZhwVjs2y6XqQto2HSVq7xEOsab
	AQvE1uHAt7fxr+yHCtch+etuWnGbUJsz7u6xerdaFmCO6aal9kxQ8pok7knnbxA5
	LMGrDJmjBsFtBqyIhvdWfOc=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:mime-version:content-type
	:content-transfer-encoding:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to
	:references:message-id; s=default; bh=iP2CAXGnGBS4GfXA4UePyIyGY1
	I=; b=kbGBCaqvytbpIcBScqI5LZ9/rLbfc45ZNg/n9KyS8E3B5N66aFdf5U0oN9
	Wn8e5VdrLXtBCdOv/SM1nTuHCcneLZ1UuYC3OGyE9A1zYly3AhVoAebua3SbxXFa
	AUW59eqxo5qkGxS20vt86tFydhaSsQuPEDXF5X/Ez9wK8ghAA=
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found: No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=no version=3.3.2 spammy=HX-HELO:sk:smtprel, Ken, H*r:sk:smtprel, H*r:80.67.31
X-HELO: smtprelay06.ispgateway.de
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Date: Mon, 05 Mar 2018 15:43:04 +0100
From: Markus Hoenicka <markus DOT hoenicka AT mhoenicka DOT de>
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: Add emacs build with LUCID X toolkit =?UTF-8?Q?=3F?=
In-Reply-To: <161b043d-c083-758b-f7b0-aca675fe652d@cornell.edu>
References: <SC1P152MB17905AD0BCCAF5204BD6EF54E1DA0 AT SC1P152MB1790 DOT LAMP152 DOT PROD DOT OUTLOOK DOT COM> <161b043d-c083-758b-f7b0-aca675fe652d AT cornell DOT edu>
Message-ID: <0727521c6adaf60b2eb4198d53d83e6f@mhoenicka.de>
X-Sender: markus DOT hoenicka AT mhoenicka DOT de
User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail
X-Df-Sender: bWFya3VzLmhvZW5pY2thQG1ob2VuaWNrYS5kZQ==
X-IsSubscribed: yes

At 2018-03-05 15:03, Ken Brown was heard to say:
> On 3/5/2018 8:21 AM, Alejandro Benitez wrote:
>> Hi,
>> I often painstakingly work on my build of emacs and never look back, 
>> praying to never come back, but then I get some annoyances such as 
>> vfork issues I can't fix. I will go further on this in a different 
>> post.
> 
> vfork issues almost always indicate a need to do a full rebase.  See
> 
>   https://cygwin.com/faq/faq.html#faq.using.fixing-fork-failures .
> 
> Or switch from 32-bit Cygwin to 64-bit Cygwin, where such problems are
> extremely rare.
> 
>> Maybe add a new emacs-lucid package ?
> 
> Cygwin's emacs uses GTK+ because that's the default for an emacs build
> on all unix-like platforms.  But I'll think about adding an
> emacs-lucid package for the next emacs release.  It would be good to
> know how much demand there is for this.  Are there other emacs-X11
> users who would prefer the Lucid toolkit?
> 

As an avid emacs user I have no desire to switch to emacs-lucid. If the 
extra work to provide both packages is limited, it would not hurt to 
have both packages though.

just my 2 cc
Markus

-- 
Markus Hoenicka
http://www.mhoenicka.de
AQ score 38


--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple