X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:reply-to:subject:to:references:from:message-id :date:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=default; b=CExMf+hJ8OSelyHf 1xd0dAJSBIVTdfwFyTCjAoaMxUDGV/FF+gjhkitlv6uLbwIP9WjPc7LNJ17tmlX+ q+nU8XOQJJMdeOvOgalegrIupMXOEzl4qygKTDqZOWMo29FCPr80ta4sHJF14M9/ p1uLAc7A4P2YmLYAzgF7nQkjxa0= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:reply-to:subject:to:references:from:message-id :date:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; s=default; bh=fW4MS3AF/a7UmhbTiR3iuu C30Xs=; b=IMH+1GxHXCq39I9UjPSJ31w0+W8OSzRefmVaFbyjk5/gybFj5PV7vk hVXFSWTRYCaPigyErTWKLfc8TmPxhoR3g8JBu2j1U8aHBBbBpJUBgHARbsHoX+dC z9LI5b0QdBS6fRGaXlJPp9uXuxEL+bFCiyS131RnMhOKfV1PFsucc= Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,WEBMAIL_BODY autolearn=no version=3.3.2 spammy=dial, isp, ISP, qv X-HELO: smtp-out-so.shaw.ca X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.3 cv=OeS28CbY c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=MVEHjbUiAHxQW0jfcDq5EA==:117 a=MVEHjbUiAHxQW0jfcDq5EA==:17 a=N659UExz7-8A:10 a=w_pzkKWiAAAA:8 a=b4eMD0GmHX_ZvWjD-W0A:9 a=pILNOxqGKmIA:10 a=aipkGos_1oEA:10 a=yarfA6YyjfcA:10 a=OmEAu2H3CAEA:10 a=sRI3_1zDfAgwuvI8zelB:22 Reply-To: Brian DOT Inglis AT SystematicSw DOT ab DOT ca Subject: Re: Another setup v2.889 regression? Again ... To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <315ef578c4fd839605ca0c4a6d98d9b1 AT xs4all DOT nl> <5a9c4cd4 DOT 712d9d0a DOT 91fdb DOT 111c AT mx DOT google DOT com> From: Brian Inglis Message-ID: Date: Sun, 4 Mar 2018 15:31:03 -0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <5a9c4cd4.712d9d0a.91fdb.111c@mx.google.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-CMAE-Envelope: MS4wfIqNUuSJVpQ6ELJ43sSwWrqEWPXmi10VodjgahprMvu6XHd7pixdvKkKDXcen0A8ZLWP4kKl7fMM7bwaCsJQn5AFdn1Ur6XhoTBzDaIo9b//ml/0oX7t tqkTFrzWuiLx5tcMbb98HJfxbkznmH7+y9lEawHilayfkIF65l+jOWX7+2UtOJ0tl9A3y1mClX787A== X-IsSubscribed: yes On 2018-03-04 12:45, Steven Penny wrote: > Hey, I think something is up with your mail client. I see you are using > "XS4ALL Webmail" (not sure what that is). First you put a new thread here: xs4all.nl was the 2nd public dial up ISP (q.v. Wikipedia); webmail is a generic term for a www mail client, a convenient service from ISPs for mail access while travelling, or as a standalone service e.g. gmail. >  http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2018-03/msg00038.html > Then you replied to yourself here: >  http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2018-03/msg00042.html > but your mail client is not prepending the subject with "Re: ", so it appears > you started a 2nd thread. Then you replied to your original post again: >  http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2018-03/msg00047.html > and again no "Re: ". Whats even more maddening is that not only do your replies > not have the "Re: ", but they dont even have the same subject: My mail client shows everything properly threaded: some folks like clarifying topics by modifying subjects; the additions are not substantial; the mail client may be dropping the Re: when the subject is changed. -- Take care. Thanks, Brian Inglis, Calgary, Alberta, Canada -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple