X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:reply-to:subject:to:references:from:message-id :date:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=default; b=vgJ/Qmz2gvmH9HHU 9Lb8xyRjTDaZfOC6UsaAkwOeCvNDhlOwNlHhNdABSfQEbrIlj6mm7yFPXvI0kXtP F4Us/JljUVas0rRKCY4g9uQ6+enMxeQNeFxRh0DhQx6nsioc4N3tWJvMW7AHRnFb xX7BJie7GuMKyYznzeHeGCkR8k0= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:reply-to:subject:to:references:from:message-id :date:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; s=default; bh=duw2AoPArDA7Hee7mqC0E1 181M0=; b=aNZIqHQVjslVWW1NdV/kwancDoebWYZ+gKhM63k90YHA8WtTlTHBgE F6t4W1pO0rOoTeXcG3usj550DAYVdnieZMeq2FKDTFK7OizxL0olZGNEEUJ1gOB5 yNiUEEADSHVac954k+UJZXQ7NVQGM8adn1m4QS2j5/MmtoDas9HVY= Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=0.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_50,KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=no version=3.3.2 spammy=brian, inglis, Brian, Inglis X-HELO: smtp-out-no.shaw.ca X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.2 cv=M/g9E24s c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=MVEHjbUiAHxQW0jfcDq5EA==:117 a=MVEHjbUiAHxQW0jfcDq5EA==:17 a=N659UExz7-8A:10 a=hdraJH7oGDWbb_qpKu8A:9 a=pILNOxqGKmIA:10 Reply-To: Brian DOT Inglis AT SystematicSw DOT ab DOT ca Subject: Re: Future of 32-bit distro To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <98715417-cabe-7b0f-8767-fd114cc929e8 AT t-online DOT de> <1185EB5F-53C1-4F84-BB14-4424F8C60074 AT Denis-Excoffier DOT org> <20180112091344 DOT GA20334 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> From: Brian Inglis Message-ID: <3e65ad8a-3ba1-9e6b-ccb6-afee9a8df9ba@SystematicSw.ab.ca> Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2018 12:02:18 -0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.5.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-CMAE-Envelope: MS4wfD0puWxtPHbjDYug/FayTpBdLdduaYdHSasOeYD+ZEC5si0AMRoBGuOLTXfc0E3fQb070jKU1wOuRMZlGrreg5ytVqoUUtUiDsMbAmMl14MqoeUxZPO2 NltXDV542b8Fv6vjgHYZA4xsu07xCgSiPUFwgOZOoL94EtgsVnKmrg+Y1uhhFhGXsKbj8UD7GM3wMw== X-IsSubscribed: yes On 2018-01-12 11:11, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote: > On 2018-01-12 03:13, Corinna Vinschen wrote: >> On Jan 11 22:52, Denis Excoffier wrote: >>> The full list contains 8006 lines, i have the complete Cygwin 32bit installation >> >> The bottom line of this is, and it has been said before and I can't >> stress this enough, we can't support this scenario at all, for the >> simple fact that we have more DLLs than fit into the 32 bit address >> space. It's not much of a problem on 64 bit, but on 32 bit it's just >> not feasible anymore. >> >> Ultimately, You should (must) not install all of Cygwin on 32 bit, only >> the set of stuff you need on top of the base category. Or install 64 >> bit Cygwin. > > If it is not possible for the entire 32-bit distribution to function as > a whole, is it time to reconsider how much we provide for 32-bit? And > when can we just drop 32-bit entirely? When the 32 bit toolchain is available under x86_64 for cross builds and testing, and Windows X EoLs 32 bit? It could take a long while for US and other governments and orgs to upgrade all hardware to support 64 bit desktops. -- Take care. Thanks, Brian Inglis, Calgary, Alberta, Canada -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple