X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:date:message-id:from:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type; q=dns; s=default; b=KZBnEjdnC2kPl4p6z zXHLUCh5CPi+3+6SYHfLhfLlyVKEqrfwvdtBGq/RfzU8OlTBMpDvUT60B86SDT5O i2doM+yHCbXUKmQUmvIMAh6tBDL3q8xoful6JO3ZX+gKNGHDaNHRL0t4Fd9SZxXP uc2j/VCwDoHv020zplCSwtoBys= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:date:message-id:from:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type; s=default; bh=YW4S2DhZi38FpJus1ur6Z4T LHt8=; b=LDQP3cwkDDk8uNcsZx2GcDuaSIQcUIK1JoLBA2RyL1XvcNf8VdYorM+ WGS7mD/VmqNSDeqqO3yeQCTGHTCRJmvaNuOhdOKmrNjcrLtDxfAa6Hz8hDrSP7Jj BKfpFG3b/dJu/4vey/r4rTwh2mU1XvA9oKaCgEHLJdDXcIMRk/u4= Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KB_WAM_FROM_NAME_SINGLEWORD,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=Gratz, gratz, Triggering, H*F:D*nl X-HELO: lb3-smtp-cloud8.xs4all.net Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2017 12:17:59 +0100 Message-ID: <097ec9905e78424afff3bce2095fc5ce@smtp-cloud8.xs4all.net> From: Houder To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: sort utility goes berzerk (x86_64) References: <177e9f9fe723eadd4a8e41e5e032d56d AT smtp-cloud9 DOT xs4all DOT net> <20171128090329 DOT GN547 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <09fc4a030cc7abb5cabf07672e683d70 AT xs4all DOT nl> <944c377d08d67cda987edfcf4389ee89 AT xs4all DOT nl> <88cr1dt9uoomfg8q58e7do6i24o1vuhj59 AT 4ax DOT com> <87bmjkhnst DOT fsf AT Rainer DOT invalid> In-Reply-to: <87bmjkhnst.fsf@Rainer.invalid> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=fixed User-Agent: mua.awk 0.99 X-CMAE-Envelope: MS4wfMLSoVypom7Qsnw0yFhyi15xZYTS1gfqssf54Znu6IH5+wlteADzScSse7si/FvmL+gFBbQpczpmqzuunokStREAV3nrJckk+2ujH4moGLIvsKywoYe5 Z/rrUd5RnBbrjyzUyOFmxh/8k0Zfuj8jSLqlS2LVZrsAK3+k1xpgyleHjZO/dJNBRT+wTBK1j0WjCg== On Wed, 29 Nov 2017 20:45:06, Achim Gratz wrote: > Houder writes: > > No, I have not executed rebaseall. The reason is, that I have > > "reinstalled" Cygwin twice now, starting with an empty repo and an > > empty root directory. > > I have seen the initial rebaseall after a fresh install go wrong due to > antivirus interference. Triggering another full rebase cleared that up, > presumably because the files were no longer marked as "new" by the > antivirus. In one particular instance I've had to manually scan the > Cygwin installation folder before things would start working correctly. All right. Now that F-Secure is gone, I again installed Cygwin64 in an empty root directory. Same result. Next, I started dash and executed rebaseall -v. No luck. Henri -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple