X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:from:subject:reply-to:to:references:message-id :date:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=default; b=e+0gIspLl1raWRPv Lme6snRMTtZijx7Xn42rHhcoQvx6SMsprFKI5u3i9SumX6E1WVFwe3+H9fbUfVde /zY05Yr/17dLdJfy+R2ZTSzIgEAbE04OVPlwn0u8xvvjG2yrrIsl0fN57HfDO9sI SJMe2pJgAlLCm/WCJ27eZyBnHMw= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:from:subject:reply-to:to:references:message-id :date:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; s=default; bh=3D2q3Tv6CUfYgp7zpoXHrT fRe6U=; b=yyPeVFs7nfyWFAcTrkbTdv0thB78ClHQ1EN9nSIpG9EffND6PqVPhp NLEG92N5ErGG7VcrEiw/z69K1W07bp6H9oirzBaJzCaCOUv0T2ks7qRACjbCf8rJ +mDVkluxK6xE7+qN/IEELHjMj/lm6h5wnfkchzUu4HINys0PZCY04= Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=no version=3.3.2 spammy= X-HELO: smtp-out-so.shaw.ca X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.2 cv=e552ceh/ c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=MVEHjbUiAHxQW0jfcDq5EA==:117 a=MVEHjbUiAHxQW0jfcDq5EA==:17 a=N659UExz7-8A:10 a=--ovKUIQjZTk_BGyGNYA:9 a=pILNOxqGKmIA:10 From: Brian Inglis Subject: Re: Requesting updated unzip for Zip64 Support Reply-To: Brian DOT Inglis AT SystematicSw DOT ab DOT ca To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: Message-ID: <6967c50a-c621-0450-8779-da35aa0ac703@SystematicSw.ab.ca> Date: Sat, 11 Nov 2017 11:28:34 -0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-CMAE-Envelope: MS4wfHyK5Fe21XOS7i15cLMM/QlLG1c0TbQsjoTriodBEGJh21VJdDIEZAGFrKSfDssFFJ8b9TQ4tXxOS5Z/6yQG+GCjiJsvDzY2m3T+hHBfjxc05Xy9obDn 1JwRegCQJo3IdTxqQe/lzURckq4+VcQ93nlCYwzJcGRqdjZUT66hRHkklpxmrTWPJKu8mybD0mD/hw== X-IsSubscribed: yes On 2017-11-10 08:07, OwN-3m-All wrote: > Strange, for some reason the current version would fail on some very large > archives (8GB+), but the version I linked worked fine in these cases too. That's Large File Support for 4GB+ files and archives, which is also in current versions. There could be bugs. Could you test on different systems to check? Above GB sizes I prefer RAR, although zpaq and p7zip can be better, and p...z utilities that parallel compress using all cores, to get close to 10% of the original size, with better alternatives getting more than .1GB smaller than RAR. Most orgs that deal with large archives over the net accept and produce RAR and some can also accept and produce high compression alternatives. -- Take care. Thanks, Brian Inglis, Calgary, Alberta, Canada -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple