X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type; q=dns; s=default; b=Pw47 7n3L20ke6YeEu2mVCqrtSG0qfXp/Ai1at6x//fp5/07axrjIvdjWFV3leWQGrN2I x7UW9CDtqz72U0GstKylNjDJg46VLfeVkpCN92nhUpEUdKOYPpEmucDdkxf1JOq7 57EbfRtpvzMlmde3RrWoaqcUduHjHErmEXYlazU= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type; s=default; bh=6x/TMMdZX/ 4AwDiwms+9U53xKcQ=; b=QuJSr/EcXqjbEZtqEH6fjz0YL3cTmvIJnPPetZW66I 7XPjsKOK5wiHxjBVNH6IWT9hNwJ0EhdQ5osIBdXjE7n4kxzfsII+MqnUuitG32sv /xAzZ8q8KNDCsEIxlcnaCimc7V0mLxfkZfI20yrU4c7On+6d1s2msGmN7GxzxhJY Y= Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY,SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=no version=3.3.2 spammy=H*M:cygwin, *that*, triplets, Fine X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mx1.redhat.com 8909BC13DA03 Authentication-Results: ext-mx08.extmail.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=cygwin.com Authentication-Results: ext-mx08.extmail.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=yselkowitz AT cygwin DOT com DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 mx1.redhat.com 8909BC13DA03 Subject: Re: Which is it -pc- or -unknown- To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <59e7e340 DOT e9099d0a DOT ecab9 DOT 127a AT mx DOT google DOT com> <5e3588d9-d0a6-4181-54aa-56afa5082eab AT gmail DOT com>

<10f91c20-d6d0-0dc4-cd2e-f71b2489defd AT cygwin DOT com> <193B1E2F-25B2-4C44-BC27-ADD19DD8CD43 AT solidrocksystems DOT com> <59c46d01-832a-357d-53b3-7cc8a7c26f1b AT gmail DOT com> <45b5c7da-e802-ae5f-9692-a9caf94fcda7 AT cygwin DOT com>

<2e67e7e4-f689-164e-da78-712f60490e9b AT gmail DOT com> From: Yaakov Selkowitz Message-ID: <07e896be-05ce-1c21-da25-c66487684bc0@cygwin.com> Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2017 10:54:51 -0500 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <2e67e7e4-f689-164e-da78-712f60490e9b@gmail.com> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="HH1N9J8VK7hIvdjiwXsp3bAGLJGAqcwAD" X-IsSubscribed: yes --HH1N9J8VK7hIvdjiwXsp3bAGLJGAqcwAD Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="u5Xt4rX2mQUsu15g2Pom7A2wCwMmHK9OV"; protected-headers="v1" From: Yaakov Selkowitz To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Message-ID: <07e896be-05ce-1c21-da25-c66487684bc0 AT cygwin DOT com> Subject: Re: Which is it -pc- or -unknown- References: <59e7e340 DOT e9099d0a DOT ecab9 DOT 127a AT mx DOT google DOT com> <5e3588d9-d0a6-4181-54aa-56afa5082eab AT gmail DOT com>

<2e67e7e4-f689-164e-da78-712f60490e9b AT gmail DOT com> In-Reply-To: <2e67e7e4-f689-164e-da78-712f60490e9b AT gmail DOT com> --u5Xt4rX2mQUsu15g2Pom7A2wCwMmHK9OV Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-CA Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 2017-10-20 10:44, cyg Simple wrote: > On 10/20/2017 11:24 AM, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote: >> On 2017-10-20 08:28, cyg Simple wrote: >>> On 10/19/2017 4:33 PM, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote: >>>> 2) the output of config.guess is a default and does NOT reflect, or ne= ed >>>> to match, our chosen triplet. There is nothing to fix in config.guess. >>> >>> Fine, it doesn't have to match, why don't you want it to? >> >> Because there is no correlation, is completely normal, and therefore no >> need to special case Cygwin. >=20 > What is *normal* about it? Just because other's do it? I gave > scenarios in the mail which you elided from your response which give > credence to a reason to change it. You are still looking at these from the same perspective you were yesterday. Let me restate this one (hopefully last) time: Your assumption is that the default and chosen triplets must/should be one and the same. They are not, they need not be, and we are far from being alone in this regard. Once you accept *that*, then the rest of this will make sense. Further insistence that they should be is counter-productive at this point. --=20 Yaakov --u5Xt4rX2mQUsu15g2Pom7A2wCwMmHK9OV-- --HH1N9J8VK7hIvdjiwXsp3bAGLJGAqcwAD Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iHQEARECADQWIQRFYAu5jKh4qpenARn/IK+aZu4flAUCWeocSxYceXNlbGtvd2l0 ekBjeWd3aW4uY29tAAoJEP8gr5pm7h+U3fYAoIGiHtNVLJ/G/6WQmqBDcBzRFytG AJwNrGfkygmugUTvMid378f058z77g== =rPGU -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --HH1N9J8VK7hIvdjiwXsp3bAGLJGAqcwAD--