X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:reply-to:subject:to:references:from:message-id :date:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=default; b=Jsn+RhkucjeR7Vxx rON1ZYYBNSLcAYe3WMvlvuKz4FTX1708FWeNaw1BVtQPTcX+0u4ZJhgiONh6fU9N 2QUMMDhQ+6OtgZzfRODeG6iHmW2jJH2Gmi8xDnieANNOYoMvgwxBzSWYJUyL1obw WZeDhUYE8IWqbkca5meES3Wkdz4= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:reply-to:subject:to:references:from:message-id :date:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; s=default; bh=V8Unv5EwGLK/ZW7D2G85KU BAvB4=; b=tg4nhbLubbsnZQiEQyEZY14RFHFxIY4EJkHdF1d6Th59LFdRF4ag6W HhmLee1oGloRiTG3KUDIGknLJn2/g03x3nhnG/fu35gUVrlZy8aQjEiF+XcZxYLv Gt0xfNymTTRvTJTNNb3Gg48qlgiGvLmJGa7brf6PNAjX3vRFr2KPM= Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=no version=3.3.2 spammy=vendors, retire, sk:$arch-r, sk:archr X-HELO: smtp-out-so.shaw.ca X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.2 cv=B4DJ6KlM c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=MVEHjbUiAHxQW0jfcDq5EA==:117 a=MVEHjbUiAHxQW0jfcDq5EA==:17 a=N659UExz7-8A:10 a=brasjeszDcTB65sGri8A:9 a=pILNOxqGKmIA:10 Reply-To: Brian DOT Inglis AT SystematicSw DOT ab DOT ca Subject: Re: Which is it -pc- or -unknown- To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <7983d97c-3c6d-e3c2-2304-9527ad4c5735 AT gmail DOT com> <59e8f0cd DOT 28279d0a DOT 292b DOT 4768 AT mx DOT google DOT com> <8a790ade-1761-b87b-b389-5f76d147c099 AT cygwin DOT com> From: Brian Inglis Message-ID: <217068b0-f4df-1c30-07f7-8d7cbf84a52a@SystematicSw.ab.ca> Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2017 13:54:30 -0600 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <8a790ade-1761-b87b-b389-5f76d147c099@cygwin.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-CMAE-Envelope: MS4wfHa4cvcQhdsGYvBjdAgDQO7X16y5Zo6TVNQo/6qFn3+CBU4mhuI+cD/phorqoP+reFsSxLH3ZEGxvru2tXg2t3Xoxp4dshjizdHYVvB/SwHEUXBvsLqX 6pz3vOnmujexO5/o+iKSfRq6BNLZAv9MJRz3+EdY6Fo489ZnOe/ZBZd7zdynijop5hTt1zlP0HMdVQ== X-IsSubscribed: yes On 2017-10-19 12:59, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote: > On 2017-10-19 13:40, cyg Simple wrote: >> x86_64-pc-cygwin is just not correct regardless of the lack of past issues. > > As I have said several times, this assertion is incorrect. You need to > use the triplet which matches the toolchain with which you are building. > For example, Fedora and RHEL all use $arch-redhat-linux as their > triplet, and there is nothing wrong with that. Vendor -unknown- is just a default in various config cases, so specifying -pc- for consistency on Cygwin builds is a valid choice by the maintainers. Perhaps a statement on the cygwin-apps list could clarify what should be done by maintainers to ensure this override, and maybe retire the use of -unknown- by any Cygwin apps in future, with a notice to this (cygwin) list for those who choose to build packages from net sources. Perhaps also patches should be submitted to the config and automake maintainers to ensure that {i*,x86_64}:CYGWIN*:*... always produce vendor -pc-. Not sure about vendors for {amd64,powerpcle}:CYGWIN*:*... in config.guess, which are currently also set to -unknown-. -- Take care. Thanks, Brian Inglis, Calgary, Alberta, Canada -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple