X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type; q=dns; s=default; b=mxsH ZbK2HMoZXf4ttG9M7uwMAUOJDtFnS3N7cFA7sohxuDE4Tgt8gKzuQe7hn1A9NLJV rTiqBmvd5tmjSm5mR44zJD6ICCh753LiqFSYf8Jrmzssa4Xyd1EusdUmmt2LkCaw 9aP9ckaj2kKOweh8GqJ+EbuWpouJU3fcH/reKxo= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type; s=default; bh=Sj4H2iAz7q YuydKYzIBf314CeWU=; b=FxJn58N17/KMpAwgkFcfuapSaNgWC1x2w/kkLrp+ZF 48ZAo7ZZ7z0JsOrIO+F/tlB5tTCoNIw8PZc0ok4BySLURna1vF+nSnIy9bK6KHrJ doBjz4ssOM7mnFGd8vgSj9zNEcpMi3fF4DAI88U8+5a+5/5nJ9Fxp3LQXmpdW2oE Q= Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY,SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=no version=3.3.2 spammy=H*M:cygwin, H*M:b389, H*c:application X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mx1.redhat.com 1084F5A5A Authentication-Results: ext-mx06.extmail.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=cygwin.com Authentication-Results: ext-mx06.extmail.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=yselkowitz AT cygwin DOT com DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 mx1.redhat.com 1084F5A5A Subject: Re: Which is it -pc- or -unknown- To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <7983d97c-3c6d-e3c2-2304-9527ad4c5735 AT gmail DOT com> <59e8f0cd DOT 28279d0a DOT 292b DOT 4768 AT mx DOT google DOT com> From: Yaakov Selkowitz Message-ID: <8a790ade-1761-b87b-b389-5f76d147c099@cygwin.com> Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2017 13:59:06 -0500 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="cGs1EKIT6RO6dRXXos2468TvXXDTWsi7d" X-IsSubscribed: yes --cGs1EKIT6RO6dRXXos2468TvXXDTWsi7d Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="cW5iI5RuidTB9KBnRJLHrs2aHMEViR1pH"; protected-headers="v1" From: Yaakov Selkowitz To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Message-ID: <8a790ade-1761-b87b-b389-5f76d147c099 AT cygwin DOT com> Subject: Re: Which is it -pc- or -unknown- References: <7983d97c-3c6d-e3c2-2304-9527ad4c5735 AT gmail DOT com> <59e8f0cd DOT 28279d0a DOT 292b DOT 4768 AT mx DOT google DOT com> In-Reply-To: --cW5iI5RuidTB9KBnRJLHrs2aHMEViR1pH Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-CA Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 2017-10-19 13:40, cyg Simple wrote: > x86_64-pc-cygwin is just not correct regardless of the lack of past issue= s. As I have said several times, this assertion is incorrect. You need to use the triplet which matches the toolchain with which you are building. For example, Fedora and RHEL all use $arch-redhat-linux as their triplet, and there is nothing wrong with that. --=20 Yaakov --cW5iI5RuidTB9KBnRJLHrs2aHMEViR1pH-- --cGs1EKIT6RO6dRXXos2468TvXXDTWsi7d Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iHMEARECADQWIQRFYAu5jKh4qpenARn/IK+aZu4flAUCWej1+hYceXNlbGtvd2l0 ekBjeWd3aW4uY29tAAoJEP8gr5pm7h+Uwy8An1KMQk0N6JKTO9HbJWh1BKs06A08 AJjiNEOQf11wdLZhmn3sbkvKePgX =0Sx4 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --cGs1EKIT6RO6dRXXos2468TvXXDTWsi7d--