X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date
	:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type; q=dns; s=default; b=jhEh
	Fg49jnn6mLN2gKqMiaFmpWYtVTCYDYoqd7juYWiZ9OWmICkSUlbfuRymqsUzepIs
	pMW0rJwNmQWWlGNNbY3K8n9lG8yiEYNEhCV5gLTyCHEA/en1IR0WvROpZNqLY4d4
	kMrciRyC2kU0LFucfRFskGr9busRjDJ3d2MLzwc=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date
	:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type; s=default; bh=x3kWPHfFLS
	1N8UaEXsLDuVMczJA=; b=Cuk52GFqWWVnweY1t7gcK2dtM1kGmfz7IXvqkLt6FO
	HwbymBtAQm61LILWymr54SxJeoFHcSN6+Rs4aB1TONCWjnKN9r53A45HcpxFnsqj
	babvM2VhfEYUYwFzuvuqQ4CSfXTCq6szQciCtpQwHeJgpPqLJShiYmAAX7nTtfPI
	s=
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found: No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY,SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=no version=3.3.2 spammy=H*M:cygwin, refusing, H*M:d6d0, instead!!
X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com
DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mx1.redhat.com 1475F7F41D
Authentication-Results: ext-mx01.extmail.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=cygwin.com
Authentication-Results: ext-mx01.extmail.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=yselkowitz AT cygwin DOT com
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 mx1.redhat.com 1475F7F41D
Subject: Re: Which is it -pc- or -unknown-
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References: <b0dab24e-629a-4d23-c199-69b60a98b9ad AT gmail DOT com> <59e7e340 DOT e9099d0a DOT ecab9 DOT 127a AT mx DOT google DOT com> <5e3588d9-d0a6-4181-54aa-56afa5082eab AT gmail DOT com> <e6342489-bc51-0ac7-df16-73ef8639ba91 AT cygwin DOT com> <bcfc8b60-f269-8647-297f-f4fa3fe58d7d AT gmail DOT com>
From: Yaakov Selkowitz <yselkowitz AT cygwin DOT com>
Message-ID: <10f91c20-d6d0-0dc4-cd2e-f71b2489defd@cygwin.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2017 13:51:52 -0500
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <bcfc8b60-f269-8647-297f-f4fa3fe58d7d@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="SEXGOSKBUblIaG4PprtTv3oRqMPU2wlaL"
X-IsSubscribed: yes

--SEXGOSKBUblIaG4PprtTv3oRqMPU2wlaL
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="k5kQh59H99sTeI5Hd1cwF2P8MSMtINJPO";
 protected-headers="v1"
From: Yaakov Selkowitz <yselkowitz AT cygwin DOT com>
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Message-ID: <10f91c20-d6d0-0dc4-cd2e-f71b2489defd AT cygwin DOT com>
Subject: Re: Which is it -pc- or -unknown-
References: <b0dab24e-629a-4d23-c199-69b60a98b9ad AT gmail DOT com>
 <59e7e340 DOT e9099d0a DOT ecab9 DOT 127a AT mx DOT google DOT com>
 <5e3588d9-d0a6-4181-54aa-56afa5082eab AT gmail DOT com>
 <e6342489-bc51-0ac7-df16-73ef8639ba91 AT cygwin DOT com>
 <bcfc8b60-f269-8647-297f-f4fa3fe58d7d AT gmail DOT com>
In-Reply-To: <bcfc8b60-f269-8647-297f-f4fa3fe58d7d AT gmail DOT com>


--k5kQh59H99sTeI5Hd1cwF2P8MSMtINJPO
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Language: en-CA
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On 2017-10-19 11:44, cyg Simple wrote:
> On 10/19/2017 11:04 AM, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote:
>> We've been building packages for 64-bit Cygwin for years now without a
>> problem.  Maybe you could just tell what you're trying to do and the
>> problem you're seeing so that we can assist you, instead of this
>> circular discussion of a nonexistent problem.
>=20
> The scenario occurred when I was trying to configure a package and that
> package was refusing to accept the config.guess build triplet.

While you're still being vague (in terms of which package you are
building and exactly what the error is), that sounds like an issue with
(usually old) sources bundling an ancient config.{guess,sub} which
doesn't know about 64-bit Cygwin.  I have several packages like this.
cygport's gnuconfigize command is intended to help with such cases.

> So I decided to do
>=20
> cyg=3D`/path/to/config.guess`; ./configure --host=3D$cyg --build=3D$cyg

This is incorrect.

> The configure couldn't find x86_64-unknown-cygwin-gcc.  When I looked in
> /usr/bin I found x86_64-pc-cygwin-gcc instead!!  So which is it, it
> cannot be both!

When you *really* need to use --build and/or --host, then you need to
use x86_64-pc-cygwin, as that is our chosen name.

--=20
Yaakov


--k5kQh59H99sTeI5Hd1cwF2P8MSMtINJPO--

--SEXGOSKBUblIaG4PprtTv3oRqMPU2wlaL
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iHQEARECADQWIQRFYAu5jKh4qpenARn/IK+aZu4flAUCWej0SBYceXNlbGtvd2l0
ekBjeWd3aW4uY29tAAoJEP8gr5pm7h+UMFEAn3NgROpaaRO26b8K/mwDKp8OyI7Y
AJ0XrNTqnmdKzzbRXOXyLUe7ABaZ9w==
=Q5Q+
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--SEXGOSKBUblIaG4PprtTv3oRqMPU2wlaL--