X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:message-id:date:from:subject:to:references :content-type; q=dns; s=default; b=wdl70TAD03MOclLvF1pdPyunEyKyD klU/lXd7U3wYEIyRn2B0zAEMK/ah+NKlA9Qrct+2ef3uS1jQ3ghbwln4zBVptqCo iSa31PMBB4S+IcLXE6YGkHH5zAiuOJJVS/i+ud4PzqmjbR0JYh8ZFDIsrZYWGsWC EFGNYdWxa6zaUs= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:message-id:date:from:subject:to:references :content-type; s=default; bh=fak51MrW6mF0S7n8hlkY4wKYTqU=; b=ZXZ jHvLYvTt8fZFfkS03HLm+1/fEy1neA9ukFbCcLXhePzv+GlnPgVyHNzrBzY+Ww8f KwhVIl55YD9NkM5qLMXKm/Q8OKbRUnBmmDH9aPXzASe86RRvGNOgAdnZWerV9nzs MvRtnbNu5tBKESzyKTUPzMxv5n5EakbAlbYrSDE0= Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM,SPF_PASS autolearn=no version=3.3.2 spammy=EG, i686pccygwin, UD:E.G, E.G X-HELO: mail-oi0-f45.google.com X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:date:from:subject:to:references :user-agent; bh=Vk4E5FM/3J43Jg/TLgrzecXlR1mTDjAmcUa7VIUrVHI=; b=quOafk4Xh6tdVtpyYDFULuq28rwVtlEtlZ6o97XrCyBvo3zZEqvhtEFhVhJZavtCsS 6b61XI6IARwNIwW9ISj2Pcdl2CDH0DehTSLYNDX4QAoX/QJm9KTMvu00ZWF4vEgh+5Lr 4GgT4brfiVqW99bzB7ULusjNNqp2/FJfH00BXZOIJOX96g2kAwtgNUBWGpPQry2RXZuR rRtjd1v9FHHsYvH5k2kZ1+LsybAEh/L0yj07f/Mvlfkf44hlHs9qdpdsNVT2Wc9FlHwl aC05GiC7EUx95k4Pf1QYPjBOyZHBDMJ39uAYvPmYaiHbmCQbjIcJo+vvwIC6WJE4giPw +QIQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AMCzsaXf6SQwZLj07FDd2x5bvWwbiMZ7CYESscUZX5IRaMN/0GmGltpy MoQLNv3MGyaB8hKFzXvUp+4YpQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABhQp+T8k/3hEU3rNpOxny9ilAPQP9ywAwir52V1VvL86bE6rJanSGd+jHBG6GPrK8jG9bXAr9b5jA== X-Received: by 10.157.82.135 with SMTP id f7mr4973822oth.247.1508369217567; Wed, 18 Oct 2017 16:26:57 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <59e7e340.e9099d0a.ecab9.127a@mx.google.com> Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2017 16:26:56 -0700 (PDT) From: Steven Penny X-Google-Original-From: Steven Penny Subject: Re: Which is it -pc- or -unknown- To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf8; format=flowed User-Agent: Tryst/2.0.1 (github.com/svnpenn/tryst) On Wed, 18 Oct 2017 08:45:11, Marco Atzeri wrote: > For a regex pattern you should include both. > I do not bore which one is built and distributed on my packages. > > E.G. on octave > > /usr/lib/octave/site/oct/i686-pc-cygwin > /usr/lib/octave/site/oct/x86_64-unknown-cygwin This is certainly not right. I can understand that we will have some discrepancies across packages, but having a different vendor in the same package is unacceptable. It suggests that x86_64-unknown-cygwin and i686-pc-cygwin differ in more ways that one, which they dont. you let it slide, then people start asking: - where is x86_64-pc-cygwin? - where is i686-unknown-cygwin? which are both valid questions when a package maintainer does dumb stuff like this. just realized that for octave package, that is you: http://cygwin.com/cygwin-pkg-maint point still stands -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple