X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:reply-to:subject:to:references:from:message-id :date:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=default; b=bv946zuePJVkOAWq TpAYRrDa4cjOdwldQgACFMzf6bNsko+jBEbTGG1N12gzb1jg0/2UzCLhtwHiNZSL +gz0pylBbXRNzbVrcbNtnLKfAdOg/heAaUIIagnKKvb2loT6HkbVcgcWTcdnNZvT OKxZlIhyfVpMMAluvdHA8Hnw6fo= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:reply-to:subject:to:references:from:message-id :date:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; s=default; bh=KGQ/K0lqwTYUOsCA1XR/eW WX7GI=; b=pnGxPWi2rs8ytDui+/Bi3Ui1X8Xfv+tpRwjpb53ntR+pG1EU1hQo4t rk2R1KZpyF0YVAomopxwVdResf4NBQHtv2VeWsFREtMp7ttpmWGgalYs68quJsWS t1aE1wA6sM2on2qboFE5I0n43npii4305+371ceFoXxx72hNbpUzw= Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=no version=3.3.2 spammy=x86_64unknowncygwin*exe, x86_64-unknown-cygwin-*.exe, corrective, UD:x86_64-pc-cygwin-*.exe X-HELO: smtp-out-no.shaw.ca X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.2 cv=a+JAzQaF c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=MVEHjbUiAHxQW0jfcDq5EA==:117 a=MVEHjbUiAHxQW0jfcDq5EA==:17 a=N659UExz7-8A:10 a=DUbaQtxwxoh-uS1IQXsA:9 a=pILNOxqGKmIA:10 Reply-To: Brian DOT Inglis AT SystematicSw DOT ab DOT ca Subject: Re: Which is it -pc- or -unknown- To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <29b66287-6bd7-4e82-b35d-12a735c2070b AT gmail DOT com> <31cae8bf-3f0a-7c4a-abea-fceaa77a7415 AT gmail DOT com> <9859a176-ec54-d2a2-f5dc-8663c4973c3e AT cygwin DOT com> <3ed24208-98fa-447d-cd66-41af5e357836 AT gmail DOT com> From: Brian Inglis Message-ID: <661725aa-562d-0fc9-8ee0-6102fae59d82@SystematicSw.ab.ca> Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2017 13:27:56 -0600 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <3ed24208-98fa-447d-cd66-41af5e357836@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-CMAE-Envelope: MS4wfE95gps66Cf4IEB8YbrUnagpaKtumlnjtVJyOSGYHMSsJLVqmWSMmNanLwow1CyT5qzAVcPH5js/vxXOIYl7Ou6Qvd04pXixN5Vfc5w30EL1pP53hlRw BArZ1DG7d0VvS+n2qfsR7AgJghRLTZdasnijuFyZJNhUoo9Jbl+N9ycncmYydgyyJd91AY8L0fvbPA== X-IsSubscribed: yes On 2017-10-18 13:10, cyg Simple wrote: > On 10/18/2017 1:11 PM, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote: >> On 2017-10-18 09:05, cyg Simple wrote: >>> Does anyone care if a patch to config.guess changes the i*:CYGWIN*:* >>> filter to echo ${UNAME_MACHINE}-unknown-cygwin? >> >> That would be incorrect. config.guess is fine as it is. >> > > So the corrective action is to distribute GCC and friends as > x86_64-unknown-cygwin-*.exe instead of x86_64-pc-cygwin-*.exe. > > MAINTAINERS: Please take note for your next releases. Does this mean 64 bit binutils needs rebuilt with current config.guess to be found by an updated gcc, or is there a different config option for that triplet? -- Take care. Thanks, Brian Inglis, Calgary, Alberta, Canada -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple