X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:reply-to:subject:to:references:from:message-id :date:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=default; b=SKq7ghYPifEkFIHD TVy4d74fT1/miIRqoi0S0wBP93kk97eeQhJbl5a1rPyAs7dP3icjbfeV8cXMh7XJ 8f9oTcmYzGwhCChRa2Nto0VWwapYNZcmvq7UApvX0y6G3WqDPJ4JqgxSh7bXHTJ4 YAFEIs19p+VqmESedWiju46KOUY= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:reply-to:subject:to:references:from:message-id :date:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; s=default; bh=IMuYz7s7dnSNwbTKIE03H0 Y6SIQ=; b=v5s/joheYgiaIvWL0f/mFx74qezOQJTj71Z+aSHn3JlPVa1tvn5iTc CbZef+qLqUGLu49HZx1PxsgvBckyxVCxTvtZ5BFlz4Kay4jceB5DeRvrcChugDCm Sj9ckhd2K8m2mmwJO0HFAIFv7UADsNvJChlzdhKX7V+9RiZRDX8+8= Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=no version=3.3.2 spammy=EG, i686pccygwin, UD:E.G, E.G X-HELO: smtp-out-no.shaw.ca X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.2 cv=HahkdmM8 c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=MVEHjbUiAHxQW0jfcDq5EA==:117 a=MVEHjbUiAHxQW0jfcDq5EA==:17 a=N659UExz7-8A:10 a=qneKkBae9uhA-K9rxP0A:9 a=pILNOxqGKmIA:10 Reply-To: Brian DOT Inglis AT SystematicSw DOT ab DOT ca Subject: Re: Which is it -pc- or -unknown- To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <29b66287-6bd7-4e82-b35d-12a735c2070b AT gmail DOT com> From: Brian Inglis Message-ID: <97bdd4a0-dda7-87de-089f-ec9c0b58db78@SystematicSw.ab.ca> Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2017 07:47:28 -0600 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-CMAE-Envelope: MS4wfH6kiYMNoQiMZCWQtPtL7sAesqEZak8ofjRWdswuBtwxYAK5rXvbF/cLoVFSNjqUK5xpqCsUHY950HSApTtKNjjvm1RQ/gfn6Y8MwyZzHcVkRs+EPzjn BXjsiQAKzvdp0J5+LoGETrG1ILEEP7TAu9sJQYmxdv49C2WPgPExXgxsiSJxDc6zFQViqdO3/IfIvA== X-IsSubscribed: yes On 2017-10-18 00:45, Marco Atzeri wrote: > On 18/10/2017 05:29, cyg Simple wrote: >> On 10/17/2017 7:49 PM, Brian Inglis wrote: >>> On 2017-10-17 13:16, cyg Simple wrote: >> I'm only concerned with Cygwin at the moment.  As I understand it the we >> should distribute x86[_64]-unknown-cygwin-*.exe and not as >> x86[_64]-pc-cygwin-*.exe  We also need to correct config.guess for the >> i*:CYGWIN*:* match. > it is irrelevant as x86[_64]-unknown-cygwin-*.exe and > x86[_64]-pc-cygwin-*.exe are equivalent. > And usually it is not x86 but i686 >  $ arch > i686 > For a regex pattern you should include both. > I do not care which one is built and distributed on my packages. > E.G. on octave > /usr/lib/octave/site/oct/i686-pc-cygwin > /usr/lib/octave/site/oct/x86_64-unknown-cygwin Do gcc... and binutils have to match so the front end can find the build tools or are there config options for binutils triplet or vendor? -- Take care. Thanks, Brian Inglis, Calgary, Alberta, Canada -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple