X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:subject:to:references:reply-to:from:message-id :date:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=default; b=pNX0bcT3xybn0O7k ZPzf3eRzCZOeix4lox+VQRX/eKugSG8AMByBzgMLzIMXSguqWya0B8ffILRH4qdD 4d7+0CtRSVfM7xRbsmgRp8qG9UN0XlODqAMqFX8SwlBtvrF9mK5oxs4Er5OSgKqo Pouo7jj/2uLF09/F2jEssrFiwCc= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:subject:to:references:reply-to:from:message-id :date:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; s=default; bh=jLPX7Z56sVFsq3GkfZ+KTS kNgqk=; b=QXaOuaum1/A0+sIyrt3I4nmL2q+mSdSJkX5xNfxXvw2uV0cPEMlFpc D0Y2S8NIp6QeJKXtmJMmfb0H0zIsvgEYEcmFp1DDvlZlSfIvHMcpfHiXVFjS8T2P V6dcGRrjOv//Chf5SnWAjmX77ay//kGFiqjLnVyJpr9OpP+lbGf08= Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-5.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,GIT_PATCH_2,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy= X-HELO: mail-io0-f173.google.com X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:reply-to:from:message-id :date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=uPmL1XqfVZLQpddVe3YzkmOLtfLhJytCzwpv2YAV2r0=; b=aEWfVDRfxaQt/lk1c4IxQ8GqRZm8IF7wtMkqDe/TyyIJLLfzZkbKPAPekICjWMExBm XOxI4WEZ23RuN64XxiAyFyDj1JZ+9XSgL8aeAXPNT+BRh0C33YbAD/87c8xYZel8BuWZ 0sV8ssPL+tGfMTWlt7P/1xaF0AwiIN9dEXoB1t8s+oHiEqRBbOUokEj9GEibFZiijFL4 w7HsnmXy/gGQxeaVnlWAi1AmSA+HfGm6HDQJF9nRD3UA9jRjrdg5z3GSh2XfIpYWazB8 ZfWG1HGAE5xZWkC/3ytD3QHmg3uiDJMZEvLMsoOczNulMqD46TdQBFVMge7b0Rtj5bDr CWNw== X-Gm-Message-State: AMCzsaWQHfSC5kRihu76BwhILxeXLElmsh+/jZbS+SMah6SYee1RT6ne t4J/Kagv1+ec2Sjreyp/ke2SeA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABhQp+RkHJ91sB2j2aMxmcPRx7O7Bzg+Y+2CQCIZsf+/GuVh8x8O+nnWlYcoJ/m2MwagGUv0MP5WPQ== X-Received: by 10.107.147.131 with SMTP id v125mr20109960iod.240.1508297103049; Tue, 17 Oct 2017 20:25:03 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: Which is it -pc- or -unknown- To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <29b66287-6bd7-4e82-b35d-12a735c2070b AT gmail DOT com> <2a7bbdb0-1a76-690f-0a2a-1f64eb612df4 AT SystematicSw DOT ab DOT ca> <04957a74-4b00-44c9-610a-c847d1dc085a AT SystematicSw DOT ab DOT ca> Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com From: cyg Simple Message-ID: <188f5885-71be-214d-c3ba-ac76eac2311d@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2017 23:25:02 -0400 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <04957a74-4b00-44c9-610a-c847d1dc085a@SystematicSw.ab.ca> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-IsSubscribed: yes On 10/17/2017 7:39 PM, Brian Inglis wrote: > On 2017-10-17 15:31, cyg Simple wrote: >> On 10/17/2017 3:45 PM, Brian Inglis wrote: >>> On 2017-10-17 13:16, cyg Simple wrote: >>>> The config.guess file[1] is confused. >>>> 840 i*:CYGWIN*:*) >>>> 841 echo ${UNAME_MACHINE}-pc-cygwin >>>> 842 exit ;; >>>> ----- >>>> 870 amd64:CYGWIN*:*:* | x86_64:CYGWIN*:*:*) >>>> 871 echo x86_64-unknown-cygwin >>>> 872 exit ;; >>>> The GCC executable is x86_64-pc-cygwin-gcc.exe but config.guess on my >>>> system gives x86_64-unknown-cygwin so specifying a fully qualified host >>>> doesn't find the executable file. So which should it be? >>>> [1]http://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/config.git/tree/config.guess?id=c003e5cb947924ca5edd25c3b840aaa373c66b28 >>> That part of the triplet is defined as vendor, so it was probably initially >>> Intel, then compatibles came out and that was genericized to PC, then someone >>> objected and discussed and came up with Unknown, rather than say Any or None. >>> It may reflect development ages of projects, autotools, defaults on projects, or >>> project politics. >>> Some projects still use PC, which may be a project override, others use Unknown, >>> which should be the default in current releases of autotools. >> So config.guess needs to change, correct? I thought the I had >> remembered the discussion that it should be -unknown- for Cygwin. But >> the GCC distribution is giving us -pc- instead which means the >> maintainer specified the target as such. That needs to change as well. >> I'm on x86_64 I bet x86 will be -pc- from config.guess just by the way >> it's coded. Confusing! > > You might want to diff the upstream config.{guess,sub} with those from > /usr/share/automake1.{14,15}/ as those are the latest, and earlier releases to > see if they are just old, in case there are project customizations. > You can then decide whether you want to look further at how much of the project > automake infrastructure you want to upgrade, or check if the project has looked > at, or is working on, doing that. > If you do so, you could look at offering that back upstream. > Brian, I quoted the git master of config.guess in my original mail. My concern is that on my 64bit Cygwin version config.guess guesses the build as x86_64-unknown-cygwin but x86_64-pc-cygwin-gcc.exe is distributed. Therefore there is a mismatch between what the maintainer gives us from the GCC distribution and what the upstream config.guess gives us. This leads to not being able to find x86_64-unknown-cygwin-gcc.exe. -- cyg Simple -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple